Converting Interns to Collective Members - Revision history

Mkille at 20:49, 13 March 2013

2013-03-13T20:49:12Z

Mkille at 00:17, 1 March 2013

2013-03-01T00:17:23Z

Rfs at 01:51, 7 July 2010

2010-07-07T01:51:40Z

Valerie at 20:47, 6 July 2010

2010-07-06T20:47:53Z

Ali: removed confusing language not directly affecting policy

2008-04-25T00:25:04Z

removed confusing language not directly affecting policy

Matteo: /* Context */ - cat (link needed)

2006-10-05T00:13:41Z

Context: - cat (link needed)

Matteo: /* Policy */ - dup info (thanks for the link!)

2006-10-05T00:12:59Z

Policy: - dup info (thanks for the link!)

Rfs: /* Policy */

2006-10-04T17:55:06Z

Policy

Ideath: little notes, like that there's no record of actually deciding on this.

2006-10-02T22:44:19Z

little notes, like that there's no record of actually deciding on this.

Matteo: + Policy Header

2006-10-02T22:41:06Z

+ Policy Header

← Older revision		Revision as of 20:49, 13 March 2013
Line 1:		Line 1:
		+	{{Delete}}
		+
	{{CollectivePhasedOut}}		{{CollectivePhasedOut}}

← Older revision		Revision as of 00:17, 1 March 2013
Line 1:		Line 1:
		+	{{CollectivePhasedOut}}
		+
		+
	==Policy==		==Policy==
	''At the Council meeting [http://lists.freegeek.org/pipermail/council/2004-September/001024.html September 15, 2004]''		''At the Council meeting [http://lists.freegeek.org/pipermail/council/2004-September/001024.html September 15, 2004]''

@@ Line 1: / Line 1: @@
 ==Policy==
 ''At the Council meeting [http://lists.freegeek.org/pipermail/council/2004-September/001024.html September 15, 2004]''
@@ Line 24: / Line 20: @@
 So taking all that (and more I'm sure) into account, what kind of policy can we create?
-[[Category:Policy Needs Work]]
+[[Category: Outdated Policy]]

← Older revision		Revision as of 20:47, 6 July 2010
Line 24:		Line 24:
	So taking all that (and more I'm sure) into account, what kind of policy can we create?		So taking all that (and more I'm sure) into account, what kind of policy can we create?

−	[[Category:Policy]]	+	[[Category:Policy Needs Work]]

← Older revision		Revision as of 00:25, 25 April 2008
Line 7:		Line 7:

	An existing non-collective worker may be moved directly into a collective position that's sufficiently similar to their current work without going through a lengthy, biased hiring process if the collective can reach a unanimous decision (no stand asides).		An existing non-collective worker may be moved directly into a collective position that's sufficiently similar to their current work without going through a lengthy, biased hiring process if the collective can reach a unanimous decision (no stand asides).
−
−	~~Current policy will be revisited in the next council meeting, but can be used if necessary.~~
−
−	~~''(The decision was not revisted at the October council meeting.)''~~

	==notes==		==notes==

← Older revision		Revision as of 00:13, 5 October 2006
Line 28:		Line 28:
	So taking all that (and more I'm sure) into account, what kind of policy can we create?		So taking all that (and more I'm sure) into account, what kind of policy can we create?

−	[[Category:Policy~~]][[Category:Link needed~~]]	+	[[Category:Policy]]

@@ Line 4: / Line 4: @@
 }}
 ==Policy==
-''At the Council meeting September 15, 2004 <not in the notes from that meeting, link needed>''
+''At the Council meeting [http://lists.freegeek.org/pipermail/council/2004-September/001024.html September 15, 2004]''
 An existing non-collective worker may be moved directly into a collective position that's sufficiently similar to their current work without going through a lengthy, biased hiring process if the collective can reach a unanimous decision (no stand asides).

@@ Line 5: / Line 5: @@
 ==Policy==
 ''At the Council meeting September 15, 2004 <not in the notes from that meeting, link needed>''
 An existing non-collective worker may be moved directly into a collective position that's sufficiently similar to their current work without going through a lengthy, biased hiring process if the collective can reach a unanimous decision (no stand asides).
@@ Line 11: / Line 25: @@
 ''(The decision was not revisted at the October council meeting.)''
 ==notes==
 ===Context===

@@ Line 1: / Line 1: @@
 {{Policy Header
   | PolicyName = Converting Interns to Collective Members
-  | notes = This Policy gives the staff the power to convert Exploritory interns to staff collective members, skipping a second open hiring process.
+  | notes = This Policy gives the staff the power to convert paid non-collective employees to staff collective members, skipping a second open hiring process.
 }}
 ==Policy==
-''At the Council meeting September 15, 2004 <link needed>''
+''At the Council meeting September 15, 2004 <not in the notes from that meeting, link needed>''
 An existing non-collective worker may be moved directly into a collective position that's sufficiently similar to their current work without going through a lengthy, biased hiring process if the collective can reach a unanimous decision (no stand asides).
@@ Line 12: / Line 12: @@
 ''(The decision was not revisted at the October council meeting.)''
 ==notes==
-==Context==
+===Context===
 The staff collective would like to be able to (in certain circumstances) move an intern or another paid person from a position outside the collective into the collective without going through an open hiring process. For example, Kathie and Marlin both started at Free Geek through the SMS program and (before we had a hiring policy) we decided to include them in the collective, rather than leave them hanging while we went through an open hiring process. The same might apply to interns paid by Free Geek.
@@ Line 27: / Line 27: @@
 So taking all that (and more I'm sure) into account, what kind of policy can we create?
-[[Category:Policy]]
+[[Category:Policy]][[Category:Link needed]]