Instagrants Policy - Revision history

Dave: outdated policy

2010-07-07T01:57:21Z

outdated policy

Matteo: formating

2008-01-21T23:12:11Z

formating

Matteo: this one was kinda hard to redocument dew to its lack of inteligable wording.

2008-01-21T23:11:30Z

this one was kinda hard to redocument dew to its lack of inteligable wording.

Rfs at 20:48, 25 August 2007

2007-08-25T20:48:39Z

Matteo: Instagrants moved to Instagrants Policy: Its The Policy

2006-10-02T18:22:30Z

Instagrants moved to Instagrants Policy: Its The Policy

Matteo: + Policy Header

2006-10-02T17:42:59Z

+ Policy Header

Rfs at 23:24, 14 January 2005

2005-01-14T23:24:32Z

Rfs at 23:23, 14 January 2005

2005-01-14T23:23:30Z

Rfs at 16:25, 22 December 2004

2004-12-22T16:25:10Z

Ideath at 20:21, 4 December 2004

2004-12-04T20:21:23Z

New page

An instagrant is a grant request that can clearly be filled without difficulty and hassle; generally, it's a request for components that we normally have in excess.

From the hardware grants meeting on 4 dec 2004:
<blockquote>Instagranting works like this: It takes two people, preferably one from Production, to OK an instagrant. If you want to instagrant something be prepared to do whatever is necessary to bring the grant to closure. It's OK to ask "Instagrant, right?" on the list and that counts as one person's approval.<br> [[http://lists.freegeek.org/pipermail/grants/2004-December/002329.html Meeting minutes]]</blockquote>

Because of their knowledge of what we have available and in excess, it's good idea to check with a member of the [[production group]] if you have doubts about the instagrantability of materials.

[[Category: policy]] [[category:grants]]

@@ Line 1: / Line 1: @@
-{{Policy Header
 ==Policy==
 ''From the hardware grants meeting on 27 nov 2007:[http://lists.freegeek.org/pipermail/minutes/2007-December/000434.html Meeting minutes]''
@@ Line 17: / Line 14: @@
-[[Category:Policy]]
+[[Category:Outdated Policy]]
 [[Category:Hardware Grants]]

@@ Line 5: / Line 5: @@
 ==Policy==
 ''From the hardware grants meeting on 27 nov 2007:[http://lists.freegeek.org/pipermail/minutes/2007-December/000434.html Meeting minutes]''
 reason:
-We are unable to do them (instagrants) as they are interrupting our work. Turn around time for grants is less than a week these days, people need to apply (for grants) with a few days to spare
+:We are unable to do them (instagrants) as they are interrupting our work. Turn around time for grants is less than a week these days, people need to apply (for grants) with a few days to spare
 ==Notes==
 === Original policy ===

@@ Line 1: / Line 1: @@
 {{Policy Header
   | PolicyName = Instagrants Policy
-  | notes =
+  | notes = making granting quicker
 }}
 ==Policy==
 ''From the hardware grants meeting on 4 dec 2004:[[http://lists.freegeek.org/pipermail/grants/2004-December/002329.html Meeting minutes]]''
@@ Line 10: / Line 15: @@
 Instagranting works like this: It takes two people, preferably one from Production, to OK an instagrant.  If you want to instagrant something be prepared to do whatever is necessary to bring the grant to closure. It's OK to ask "Instagrant,  right?" on the list and that counts as one person's approval.
 [[Category:Policy]]
 [[Category:Hardware Grants]]

← Older revision		Revision as of 20:48, 25 August 2007
Line 14:		Line 14:

	[[Category:Policy]]		[[Category:Policy]]
−	[[Category:~~HardwareGrants~~]]	+	[[Category:Hardware Grants]]

← Older revision		Revision as of 23:24, 14 January 2005
Line 6:		Line 6:
	Because of their knowledge of what we have available and in excess, it's good idea to check with a member of the [[production group]] if you have doubts about the instagrantability of materials.		Because of their knowledge of what we have available and in excess, it's good idea to check with a member of the [[production group]] if you have doubts about the instagrantability of materials.

−	[[Category:Policy]] [[~~category~~:HardwareGrants]]	+	[[Category:Policy]]
		+	[[Category:HardwareGrants]]

← Older revision	Revision as of 18:22, 2 October 2006
(No difference)

← Older revision		Revision as of 23:23, 14 January 2005
Line 6:		Line 6:
	Because of their knowledge of what we have available and in excess, it's good idea to check with a member of the [[production group]] if you have doubts about the instagrantability of materials.		Because of their knowledge of what we have available and in excess, it's good idea to check with a member of the [[production group]] if you have doubts about the instagrantability of materials.

−	[[Category:Policy]] [[category:~~Grants~~]]	+	[[Category:Policy]] [[category:HardwareGrants]]

← Older revision		Revision as of 16:25, 22 December 2004
Line 6:		Line 6:
	Because of their knowledge of what we have available and in excess, it's good idea to check with a member of the [[production group]] if you have doubts about the instagrantability of materials.		Because of their knowledge of what we have available and in excess, it's good idea to check with a member of the [[production group]] if you have doubts about the instagrantability of materials.

−	[[Category: ~~policy~~]] [[category:~~grants~~]]	+	[[Category:Policy]] [[category:Grants]]