Meta Triage of Systems - Revision history

Rfs at 22:24, 14 March 2009

2009-03-14T22:24:43Z

Rfs at 23:13, 14 January 2009

2009-01-14T23:13:34Z

Rfs at 22:40, 14 January 2009

2009-01-14T22:40:42Z

Vagrant: /* Non-upgradeable */ added IBM PS/1 and PS/2 models

2009-01-11T20:33:33Z

Non-upgradeable: added IBM PS/1 and PS/2 models

Rfs at 00:18, 3 January 2009

2009-01-03T00:18:21Z

Rfs at 16:52, 2 January 2009

2009-01-02T16:52:56Z

Rfs at 01:39, 13 December 2008

2008-12-13T01:39:34Z

Kathie2.0 at 00:20, 16 November 2008

2008-11-16T00:20:25Z

Kathie2.0 at 23:59, 15 November 2008

2008-11-15T23:59:35Z

Rfs at 23:53, 3 June 2008

2008-06-03T23:53:54Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 22:24, 14 March 2009
Line 72:		Line 72:
	Since these systems are seldom upgraded, markings on the outside usually indicate what is actually in the computer.		Since these systems are seldom upgraded, markings on the outside usually indicate what is actually in the computer.

−	~~{{Exceptional Components List}}~~	+	[[Category: Old Prebuild]]
−
−	[[Category: Prebuild]]

@@ Line 21: / Line 21: @@
     start       -> atkeyboard
-    damaged     -> yellow [taillabel="YES"]
+    damaged     -> uncovered [taillabel="YES"]
     damaged     -> missingmobo [taillabel="NO"]

@@ Line 13: / Line 13: @@
     p2          [label="Marked P2 or worse?"]
     low_speed   [label="Marked too slow?"]
-    exceptional [label="Does it have anything\nfrom the\nEXCEPTIONAL COMPONENTS\nlist?"]
+    uncovered   [label="Does it have an\nUNCOVERED ELECTRONIC DEVICE\nor an\nFG-PDX\nlabel?"]
     keep        [label="KEEP IT HERE\nin Incoming Pile", shape="box", style="bold"]
-    red         [label="RED\n(no mining)", shape="box", style="bold"]
+    blue        [label="This will need to\ngo through the\nBLUE CHART\n(Visual Triage)", shape="box", style="bold"]
     yellow      [label="YELLOW\n(mining)", shape="box", style="bold"]
@@ Line 23: / Line 24: @@
     damaged     -> missingmobo [taillabel="NO"]
-    missingmobo -> exceptional [taillabel="YES"]
+    missingmobo -> uncovered [taillabel="YES"]
     missingmobo -> keep [taillabel="NO"]
-    atkeyboard  -> exceptional [taillabel="YES"]
+    atkeyboard  -> uncovered [taillabel="YES"]
     atkeyboard  -> proprietary [taillabel="NO"]
@@ Line 32: / Line 33: @@
     proprietary -> damaged [taillabel="NO"]
-    p2 -> exceptional [taillabel="YES"]
+    p2 -> uncovered [taillabel="YES"]
     p2 -> low_speed [taillabel="NO"]
-    low_speed -> exceptional [taillabel="YES"]
+    low_speed -> uncovered [taillabel="YES"]
     low_speed -> damaged [taillabel="NO"]
-    exceptional -> red    [taillabel="NO"]
+   uncovered -> yellow       [taillabel="YES"]
     exceptional -> yellow [taillabel="YES"]

@@ Line 63: / Line 63: @@
 * Micron
 * Packard Bell
 Since these systems are seldom upgraded, markings on the outside usually indicate what is actually in the computer.

@@ Line 13: / Line 13: @@
     p2          [label="Marked P2 or worse?"]
     low_speed   [label="Marked too slow?"]
-    good_burner [label="HIGH SPEED or\nULTRA SPEED\nCD RW?"]
+    exceptional [label="Does it have anything\nfrom the\nEXCEPTIONAL COMPONENTS\nlist?"]
     keep        [label="KEEP IT HERE\nin Incoming Pile", shape="box", style="bold"]
     red         [label="RED\n(no mining)", shape="box", style="bold"]
@@ Line 23: / Line 23: @@
     damaged     -> missingmobo [taillabel="NO"]
-    missingmobo -> good_burner [taillabel="YES"]
+    missingmobo -> exceptional [taillabel="YES"]
     missingmobo -> keep [taillabel="NO"]
-    atkeyboard  -> good_burner [taillabel="YES"]
+    atkeyboard  -> exceptional [taillabel="YES"]
     atkeyboard  -> proprietary [taillabel="NO"]
@@ Line 32: / Line 32: @@
     proprietary -> damaged [taillabel="NO"]
-    p2 -> good_burner [taillabel="YES"]
+    p2 -> exceptional [taillabel="YES"]
     p2 -> low_speed [taillabel="NO"]
-    low_speed -> good_burner [taillabel="YES"]
+    low_speed -> exceptional [taillabel="YES"]
     low_speed -> damaged [taillabel="NO"]
-    good_burner -> red    [taillabel="NO"]
+    exceptional -> red    [taillabel="NO"]
-    good_burner -> yellow [taillabel="YES"]
+    exceptional -> yellow [taillabel="YES"]
+   }
@@ Line 64: / Line 64: @@
 * Packard Bell
 Since these systems are seldom upgraded, markings on the outside usually indicate what is actually in the computer.
 [[Category: Prebuild]]

@@ Line 8: / Line 8: @@
     missingmobo [label="Missing the\nMotherboard?"]
-    damaged     [label="Missing sides?\nor Other major damage?"]
+    damaged     [label="Missing sides?\nor other major damage?"]
     atkeyboard  [label="AT Keyboard\nconnector?"]
-    incoming    [label="Leave on \nINCOMING\npile", shape="box", style="bold"]
+    proprietary [label="Non-upgradeable model?\n(see list)"]
-    reject      [label="Label and put on\nREJECT\npile", shape="box", style="bold"]
+   p2          [label="Marked P2 or worse?"]
-    start       -> damaged
+    start       -> atkeyboard
-    damaged     -> reject [taillabel="YES"]
+    damaged     -> yellow [taillabel="YES"]
     damaged     -> missingmobo [taillabel="NO"]
-    missingmobo -> reject [taillabel="YES"]
+    missingmobo -> good_burner [taillabel="YES"]
-    missingmobo -> atkeyboard [taillabel="NO"]
+    missingmobo -> keep [taillabel="NO"]
-    atkeyboard  -> reject [taillabel="YES"]
+    atkeyboard  -> good_burner [taillabel="YES"]
-    atkeyboard  -> incoming [taillabel="NO"]
+    atkeyboard  -> proprietary [taillabel="NO"]
+   }
 </graphvizr>
-Meta-triage should take into account the current needs of both '''Hardware ID and Case Management''' and '''System Evaluation'''. For example, if there are a lot of systems in '''Hardware ID''' and not so many in '''System Evaluation''', moving incoming systems directly into '''Hardware ID''' should be avoided.
+The idea of this chart is to determine is a system is so low end we are not interested in mining it for parts. In general this job should be done by trained system evaluation instructors and staff.
 [[Category: Prebuild]]

@@ Line 1: / Line 1: @@
 <graphvizr>
-   digraph BUILDPATH {
+   digraph D {
     node [fontname="Helvetica", fontsize="11"]

@@ Line 28: / Line 28: @@
 The idea of this chart is to safely bypass the ever-bottlenecked INCOMING pile in system evaluation. If you don't know how to identify the terms on this page, please learn to before attempting this job. In general this job should be done by trained system evaluation instructors and staff.
-Meta-triage should take into account the current needs of both System Eval 1 and System Eval 2. For example, if there are a lot of systems in Eval 1, and not so many in 2, moving incoming system directly into Eval 1 could be avoided.
+Meta-triage should take into account the current needs of both Hardware ID and Case Management and System Eval. For example, if there are a lot of systems in Hardware ID and not so many in System Eval, moving incoming systems directly into Hardware ID should be avoided.
 Category:
 [[Category: Prebuild]]