Sponsoring organizations criteria - Revision history

Luiz: /* Definitions */

2008-08-01T17:44:44Z

Definitions

2008-08-01T17:36:19Z

Definitions

2008-08-01T17:35:53Z

Definitions

2008-08-01T17:35:22Z

One approach

2008-08-01T17:35:08Z

2008-08-01T17:26:40Z

Another approach

2008-07-26T00:05:21Z

2008-07-25T23:38:18Z

2008-07-25T23:37:59Z

New page: {{Proposed Policy}} Test

New page

{{Proposed Policy}}

Test

@@ Line 20: / Line 20: @@
 ''Events coordinators can allow non-competitors and friendly competitors to sponsor an event and get a mention in our brochures and on a banner for the event, and that competitors are not allowed to have a table or do outreach at our event.''
-If "do outreach" were more tightly defined or the wording changed, this be be better, IMHO [[User:Luiz|Luiz]] 17:35, 1 August 2008 (UTC)
+If "do outreach" were more tightly defined or the wording changed, this would be better, IMHO [[User:Luiz|Luiz]] 17:35, 1 August 2008 (UTC)
 At this point the definitions are open to change and the policy is just a draft. Please post comments.

@@ Line 18: / Line 18: @@
 We could draft a policy around those definitions. For example we could say:
-''Events coordinators can allow non-competitors and friendly competitors to sponsor an event and get a mention in our brochures and on a banner for the event, and that competitors are not allowed to have a table or do outreach at our event. ""
+''Events coordinators can allow non-competitors and friendly competitors to sponsor an event and get a mention in our brochures and on a banner for the event, and that competitors are not allowed to have a table or do outreach at our event.''
 If "do outreach" were more tightly defined or the wording changed, this be be better, IMHO [[User:Luiz|Luiz]] 17:35, 1 August 2008 (UTC)

@@ Line 16: / Line 16: @@
 : This would include organizations that operate in the same market as we do but we don't do direct business with. An example might be a used computer store.
-We could draft a policy around those definitions. For example we could say that events coordinators can allow non-competitors and friendly competitors to sponsor an event and get a mention in our brochures and on a banner for the event, and that competitors are not allowed to have a table or do outreach at our event.
+We could draft a policy around those definitions. For example we could say:
 If "do outreach" were more tightly defined or the wording changed, this be be better, IMHO [[User:Luiz|Luiz]] 17:35, 1 August 2008 (UTC)

← Older revision		Revision as of 17:35, 1 August 2008
Line 17:		Line 17:

	We could draft a policy around those definitions. For example we could say that events coordinators can allow non-competitors and friendly competitors to sponsor an event and get a mention in our brochures and on a banner for the event, and that competitors are not allowed to have a table or do outreach at our event.		We could draft a policy around those definitions. For example we could say that events coordinators can allow non-competitors and friendly competitors to sponsor an event and get a mention in our brochures and on a banner for the event, and that competitors are not allowed to have a table or do outreach at our event.
		+	If "do outreach" were more tightly defined or the wording changed, this be be better, IMHO [[User:Luiz\|Luiz]] 17:35, 1 August 2008 (UTC)

	At this point the definitions are open to change and the policy is just a draft. Please post comments.		At this point the definitions are open to change and the policy is just a draft. Please post comments.

@@ Line 3: / Line 3: @@
 This policy could apply to the situation where we are asking for sponsorships for an outreach type event or perhaps we could apply something like this more broadly.
-== One approach ==
+== Definitions ==
 There are three types of organizations from a sponsorship point of view:
@@ Line 20: / Line 20: @@
 At this point the definitions are open to change and the policy is just a draft. Please post comments.
-== Another approach ==
+== Exceptions ==
 ''(This could be independent of or in addition to the above.)''
@@ Line 28: / Line 28: @@
 For instance we could require that all sponsors (or any exceptions to the above rule) go through a staff meeting (or a PR meeting, etc.) and that the decision be made there.
-== Also note ==
+== Purpose of policy ==
 This policy is intended to address issues around competing organizations that may want to do outreach at our outreach events. It is not intended to address other issues that could come up in regard to sponsors and tabling at events. For example, this policy is not intended to address what we would do if (for example) the Ku Klux Klan wanted to sponsor an event and if someone in the community objected. That would be something separate, I think.

← Older revision		Revision as of 17:26, 1 August 2008
Line 28:		Line 28:
	For instance we could require that all sponsors (or any exceptions to the above rule) go through a staff meeting (or a PR meeting, etc.) and that the decision be made there.		For instance we could require that all sponsors (or any exceptions to the above rule) go through a staff meeting (or a PR meeting, etc.) and that the decision be made there.

		+	== Also note ==
	This policy is intended to address issues around competing organizations that may want to do outreach at our outreach events. It is not intended to address other issues that could come up in regard to sponsors and tabling at events. For example, this policy is not intended to address what we would do if (for example) the Ku Klux Klan wanted to sponsor an event and if someone in the community objected. That would be something separate, I think.		This policy is intended to address issues around competing organizations that may want to do outreach at our outreach events. It is not intended to address other issues that could come up in regard to sponsors and tabling at events. For example, this policy is not intended to address what we would do if (for example) the Ku Klux Klan wanted to sponsor an event and if someone in the community objected. That would be something separate, I think.

@@ Line 1: / Line 1: @@
-{{Proposed Policy}}
+{{policy in development}}
-Test
+This policy could apply to the situation where we are asking for sponsorships for an outreach type event or perhaps we could apply something like this more broadly.
-[[Category: Policy]]
+== One approach ==