Talk:System Evaluation Overview - Revision history

Rfs: Talk:System Evaluation 2 Overview moved to Talk:System Evaluation Overview

2008-10-25T22:11:28Z

Talk:System Evaluation 2 Overview moved to Talk:System Evaluation Overview

Rfs at 16:59, 8 February 2006

2006-02-08T16:59:41Z

Gambitnut: asked richard for clarification of his edit

2006-02-08T05:24:31Z

asked richard for clarification of his edit

Rfs: Put back stuff?

2006-02-04T00:38:42Z

Put back stuff?

Gambitnut: responded

2006-02-02T06:35:12Z

responded

Rfs at 02:57, 2 February 2006

2006-02-02T02:57:23Z

New page

This chart has us label with a reason for recycle label and mark the speed even if it's a special miner (in which case we pull the mobo and the label makes no sense no more). [[User:Rfs|RfS]]

← Older revision		Revision as of 16:59, 8 February 2006
Line 1:		Line 1:
−	~~This chart has us label with~~ a reason ~~for recycle label and mark~~ the ~~speed even if it's a special miner (in which case we pull the mobo and the label makes no sense no more).~~ [[User:~~Rfs~~\|~~RfS~~]]	+	Is there a reason the white hole box was unbolded? [[User:gambitnut\|Blaine]]

−	~~If they don't have a hold for store label at that point~~, ~~we don't want the case.~~ I ~~think you are right though that we don~~'t ~~want to label it until we get to the final reason, no motherboard. I changed it. Is that better? [[User:gambitnut\|Blaine]]~~	+	: No, I just wasn't finished editing and got called away. [[User:Rfs\|RfS]] 08:59, 8 Feb 2006 (PST)
−
−	~~== Put back stuff? ==~~
−
−	~~For Servers [[Getting the Processor Information]] has them skip pulling stuff out (i.e. neither a SIMPLIFY nor a SWAP RAM step), so they will not have pulled stuff out yet~~. [[User:Rfs\|RfS]] 16:38, 3 Feb 2006 (PST)
−
−	~~Is there a reason the white hole box was unbolded? [[User:gambitnut\|Blaine]]~~

← Older revision		Revision as of 05:24, 8 February 2006
Line 6:		Line 6:

	For Servers [[Getting the Processor Information]] has them skip pulling stuff out (i.e. neither a SIMPLIFY nor a SWAP RAM step), so they will not have pulled stuff out yet. [[User:Rfs\|RfS]] 16:38, 3 Feb 2006 (PST)		For Servers [[Getting the Processor Information]] has them skip pulling stuff out (i.e. neither a SIMPLIFY nor a SWAP RAM step), so they will not have pulled stuff out yet. [[User:Rfs\|RfS]] 16:38, 3 Feb 2006 (PST)
		+
		+	Is there a reason the white hole box was unbolded? [[User:gambitnut\|Blaine]]

← Older revision		Revision as of 00:38, 4 February 2006
Line 2:		Line 2:

	If they don't have a hold for store label at that point, we don't want the case. I think you are right though that we don't want to label it until we get to the final reason, no motherboard. I changed it. Is that better? [[User:gambitnut\|Blaine]]		If they don't have a hold for store label at that point, we don't want the case. I think you are right though that we don't want to label it until we get to the final reason, no motherboard. I changed it. Is that better? [[User:gambitnut\|Blaine]]
		+
		+	== Put back stuff? ==
		+
		+	For Servers [[Getting the Processor Information]] has them skip pulling stuff out (i.e. neither a SIMPLIFY nor a SWAP RAM step), so they will not have pulled stuff out yet. [[User:Rfs\|RfS]] 16:38, 3 Feb 2006 (PST)

← Older revision		Revision as of 06:35, 2 February 2006
Line 1:		Line 1:
	This chart has us label with a reason for recycle label and mark the speed even if it's a special miner (in which case we pull the mobo and the label makes no sense no more). [[User:Rfs\|RfS]]		This chart has us label with a reason for recycle label and mark the speed even if it's a special miner (in which case we pull the mobo and the label makes no sense no more). [[User:Rfs\|RfS]]
		+
		+	If they don't have a hold for store label at that point, we don't want the case. I think you are right though that we don't want to label it until we get to the final reason, no motherboard. I changed it. Is that better? [[User:gambitnut\|Blaine]]

← Older revision	Revision as of 22:11, 25 October 2008
(No difference)