Talk:Vision statement - Revision history

Kathey at 23:19, 16 June 2009

2009-06-16T23:19:46Z

2009-06-16T23:18:31Z

Ways to use the Vision statement: new section

2009-06-16T23:14:35Z

2007-08-18T17:28:31Z

2007-08-18T17:23:17Z

2007-08-18T17:17:07Z

2007-08-18T17:16:08Z

2007-07-17T18:50:06Z

Couple of notes

2007-07-15T00:56:52Z

Permanent Location

2007-07-15T00:56:31Z

@@ Line 13: / Line 13: @@
 : [[User:Rfs|RfS]] 11:50, 17 July 2007 (PDT)
 == Ways to use the Vision statement ==
 The vision statement document presents a clear picture of a proposed future snapshot in time. This is very very helpful for long term planning in the present time. One question to answer when evaluating program proposals is: "How might this program help realize Free Geek's Vision?" Another question to help this process along is: "How does the Vision statement compare with Free Geek's present reality, and what is needed to bridge the gap?

← Older revision		Revision as of 23:18, 16 June 2009
Line 18:		Line 18:

	: ks		: ks
		+
		+	== Ways to use the Vision statement ==
		+
		+	The vision statement document presents a clear picture of a proposed future snapshot in time. This is very very helpful for long term planning in the present time. One question to answer when evaluating program proposals is: "How might this program help realize Free Geek's Vision?" Another question to help this process along is: "How does the Vision statement compare with Free Geek's present reality, and what is needed to bridge the gap?

@@ Line 1: / Line 1: @@
 == Permanent Location ==
-We have a great landlord, but the facility is inadequate for any growth. The warehouse especially is very difficult to work with. A larger (especially taller) warehouse would give recycling and storage real space to work with. Maybe Free Geek should look into buying a building? Possibly one that would also generate income. The organization could put a safe and clean facility into its vision. This is of course just a sugesstion.  Imagine a facility in a neighborhood within closedistance to buses, adequate parking, and a floorplan we could design and change. The money for rent could go toward ownership of a building.
+We have a great landlord, but the facility is inadequate for any growth. The warehouse especially is very difficult to work with. A larger (especially taller) warehouse would give recycling and storage real space to work with. Maybe Free Geek should look into buying a building? Possibly one that would also generate income. The organization could put a safe and clean facility into its vision. This is of course just a sugesstion.  Imagine a facility in a neighborhood within close distance to buses, adequate parking, and a floorplan we could design and change. The money for rent could go toward ownership of a building.
 : 10:49, 12 July 2007 [[User:nathanb|nathanb]]
@@ Line 12: / Line 12: @@
 : [[User:Rfs|RfS]] 11:50, 17 July 2007 (PDT)

← Older revision		Revision as of 18:50, 17 July 2007
Line 4:		Line 4:

	: 10:49, 12 July 2007 [[User:nathanb\|nathanb]]		: 10:49, 12 July 2007 [[User:nathanb\|nathanb]]
		+
		+	== Couple of notes ==
		+
		+	As we develop this vision, we should be noting the external factors that may come into play. For instance, increased competition in the industry. What's that look like, and how can FG anticipate it? (There's a little in there about changing technologies which is a good start.)
		+
		+	About buying our own building. In the short run, this doesn't save us money on rent (probably). It means instead that we're paying a mortgage instead of rent. Having our own building could still be a very good thing (more likely to get grants, building equity in the property, more control of how we use the space, etc.). But for the next decade or more we'll not likely see any relief in terms of rent.
		+
		+	: [[User:Rfs\|RfS]] 11:50, 17 July 2007 (PDT)

← Older revision		Revision as of 00:56, 15 July 2007
Line 3:		Line 3:
	We have a great landlord, but the facility is inadequate for any growth. The warehouse especially is very difficult to work with. A larger (especially taller) warehouse would give recycling and storage real space to work with. Maybe Free Geek should look into buying a building? Possibly one that would also generate income. The organization could put a safe and clean facility into its vision. This is of course just a sugesstion. Imagine a facility in a neighborhood within closedistance to buses, adequate parking, and a floorplan we could design and change. The money for rent could go toward ownership of a building.		We have a great landlord, but the facility is inadequate for any growth. The warehouse especially is very difficult to work with. A larger (especially taller) warehouse would give recycling and storage real space to work with. Maybe Free Geek should look into buying a building? Possibly one that would also generate income. The organization could put a safe and clean facility into its vision. This is of course just a sugesstion. Imagine a facility in a neighborhood within closedistance to buses, adequate parking, and a floorplan we could design and change. The money for rent could go toward ownership of a building.

−	: [[User:nathanb\|nathanb]]	+	: 10:49, 12 July 2007 [[User:nathanb\|nathanb]]
−
−	~~17:56, 14 July 2007 (PDT)~~

← Older revision	Revision as of 17:28, 18 August 2007
(No difference)

← Older revision	Revision as of 17:23, 18 August 2007
(No difference)

← Older revision	Revision as of 17:17, 18 August 2007
(No difference)

← Older revision	Revision as of 17:16, 18 August 2007
(No difference)