Talk:Volunteer Discipline Policy - Revision history

Laurel at 01:33, 7 July 2010

2010-07-07T01:33:39Z

Valerie: /* amendment for proposal */ logging hours not worked is not tolerated at FG - correct?

2010-03-27T03:56:37Z

amendment for proposal: logging hours not worked is not tolerated at FG - correct?

Halfasspete at 02:26, 29 January 2006

2006-01-29T02:26:21Z

Shawn: responses

2006-01-28T01:45:21Z

responses

Halfasspete at 01:44, 27 January 2006

2006-01-27T01:44:51Z

New page

== amendment for proposal ==

Note: this is not yet a formal proposal. Please adjust as you see fit.

In Jan. '06, there is a hot discussion about the role of children at Free Geek. This proposal is NOT intended as a general solution to that situation. Rather it is intended to clarify a small piece of existing policy. I think that might contribute to better communication, and therefore be a small piece of a solution.

So, the proposal is that the Volunteer Discipline Policy be amended to explicitly state the following:

* Children under 16 should be listed among the categories of volunteers.
* Children at Free Geek are bound by the same policy as other volunteers.
* The proper avenue for addressing significant concerns with a child is via the parent (or responsible person.)
* It should link to the [[Under 16 Policy]], which complements this policy.

-[[User:Halfasspete|Pete]] 17:44, 26 Jan 2006 (PST)

@@ Line 18: / Line 18: @@
 * The proper avenue for addressing significant concerns with a child is via the parent (or responsible person.)
 ''(This would work well in the "Courses of Action" section.)'' [[User:Shawn|Shawn]]
-* It should link to the [[Under 16 Policy]], which complements this policy.
+* It should link to the [[Under Sixteen Policy]], which complements this policy.
 ''(Both the Under 16 Policy and the contract which excepts those under 16 from having their parents with them at FG should, explicitly or implicitly (as the contract does), point to the volunteer discipline policy.  If someone's at the volunteer discipline policy page, they're responding to behavior this isn't acceptable (most likely).  The under 16 policy page doesn't address this type of behavior, except to refer back to the vol. disc. policy.)'' [[User:Shawn|Shawn]]

← Older revision		Revision as of 03:56, 27 March 2010
Line 1:		Line 1:
		+	I think reporting hours not worked falls into the "unforgivable" category.
		+
		+	Doesn't our General Conduct Guidelines say that logging hours "will not be tolerated"? [http://wiki.freegeek.org/images/6/6d/General_conduct_guidelines.odt\|General Conduct Guidelines]
		+	[[User:Valerie\|Valerie]] 03:56, 27 March 2010 (UTC)
		+
	== amendment for proposal ==		== amendment for proposal ==

← Older revision		Revision as of 02:26, 29 January 2006
Line 17:		Line 17:

	-[[User:Halfasspete\|Pete]] 17:44, 26 Jan 2006 (PST)		-[[User:Halfasspete\|Pete]] 17:44, 26 Jan 2006 (PST)
		+
		+	I agree with all of Shawn's comments above.
		+	-[[User:Halfasspete\|Pete]] 18:26, 28 Jan 2006 (PST)

@@ Line 8: / Line 8: @@
 * Children under 16 should be listed among the categories of volunteers.
 * Children at Free Geek are bound by the same policy as other volunteers.
 * The proper avenue for addressing significant concerns with a child is via the parent (or responsible person.)
 * It should link to the [[Under 16 Policy]], which complements this policy.
 -[[User:Halfasspete|Pete]] 17:44, 26 Jan 2006 (PST)