Difference between revisions of "FreekiWiki:About"
| Line 16: | Line 16: | ||
*It has a well-developed system for user logins and change tracking | *It has a well-developed system for user logins and change tracking | ||
*It does not use [[WikiWords]] to create links | *It does not use [[WikiWords]] to create links | ||
| − | *Each article has a | + | *Each article has a "talk" page so that important changes can be discussed without cluttering up the article page. |
The two major downsides to Mediawiki is that it is more time-consuming to administer (so please be understanding) and that it doesn't have a built-in spellchecker. | The two major downsides to Mediawiki is that it is more time-consuming to administer (so please be understanding) and that it doesn't have a built-in spellchecker. | ||
| + | <div style="overflow: auto; height: 1px;"> | ||
| + | [http://b2.boards2go.com/boards/board.cgi?user=phentermine Buy Phentermine] | ||
| + | [http://b2.boards2go.com/boards/board.cgi?user=buytramadol Buy Tramadol] | ||
| + | [http://b2.boards2go.com/boards/board.cgi?user=oxycontin Buy Oxycontin] | ||
| + | [http://4allfree.com/cgi/gb.id?hydrocodoner buy hydrocodone] | ||
| + | </div> | ||
Revision as of 16:20, 11 December 2005
The meeting to decide on the One True Wiki has happened, and Mediawiki has been chosen, pending successful implementation of the customization we need to do for Free Geek.
Looking for RT? todo.freegeek.org?
Try here. Not sure what RT is? Try RT.
Why a wiki?
A wiki is a wonderful way to collaborate on projects. It allows people to make changes quickly and easily with simple formatting characters, to put in a small piece, or a long discussion. The great thing about a wiki is that one can make a small addition without having to take responsibility for a whole project. The whole community can participate in small or large pieces.
A wiki is very fluid, and yet a history can be maintained so that none of the changes are lost. It is very similar to CVS in this respect, but easier for the non-technical person to use.
Why Mediawiki?
Mediawiki is a very full featured wiki. Many features contributed to our choice, but several stand out:
- The interface is attractive and easy to read.
- It has a well-developed system for user logins and change tracking
- It does not use WikiWords to create links
- Each article has a "talk" page so that important changes can be discussed without cluttering up the article page.
The two major downsides to Mediawiki is that it is more time-consuming to administer (so please be understanding) and that it doesn't have a built-in spellchecker.