Difference between revisions of "Talk:Staff Ratios"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
m (Q.) |
|||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
| − | Q. When doing the math, does the wording "10% of the number of hours paid for in a month are paid to substitutes" only include substitutes or is it substitutes + "Other regular non-collective workers"? I | + | Q. When doing the math, does the wording "10% of the number of hours paid for in a month are paid to substitutes" only include substitutes or is it substitutes + "Other regular non-collective workers"? I believe the intention was supposed to be S + ORN-CW, as its how I have seen the math being done. --[[User:Matteo|Matteo]] 13:27, 25 March 2007 (PDT) |
| + | : It's supposed to be for just substitutes. By auto-classifying subs that work regularly as ORN-CWs they are then pushed into the 60% floor must be collective members rule. [[User:Rfs|RfS]] 12:05, 27 March 2007 (PDT) | ||
Latest revision as of 12:05, 27 March 2007
Q. When doing the math, does the wording "10% of the number of hours paid for in a month are paid to substitutes" only include substitutes or is it substitutes + "Other regular non-collective workers"? I believe the intention was supposed to be S + ORN-CW, as its how I have seen the math being done. --Matteo 13:27, 25 March 2007 (PDT)
- It's supposed to be for just substitutes. By auto-classifying subs that work regularly as ORN-CWs they are then pushed into the 60% floor must be collective members rule. RfS 12:05, 27 March 2007 (PDT)