Difference between revisions of "Probationary Review"

From FreekiWiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(how ya doin' on commitments)
(get rid of redundant open-ended questions)
Line 52: Line 52:
  
  
What is commendable about xxx's contribution to Free Geek?
+
(Do you support changing xxx's probationary collective status to permanent at this time, and Why, or why not?:)(use only if applicable)
  
Give Constructive feedback on how xxx's work performance could be improved:
+
Any suggestions for goals or professional objectives this person could work on for their next review?
 
 
(Do you support changing xxx's probationary collective status to permanent at this time, and Why, or why not?:)(use only if applicable)
 
  
 
Any additional comments for xxx?  If you write your name after your comment in this section, it will be included in the form the reviewee will read.
 
Any additional comments for xxx?  If you write your name after your comment in this section, it will be included in the form the reviewee will read.

Revision as of 13:04, 8 April 2005

These questions are used for every review of a collective member at Free Geek. Specifically, they're used in the form the Review Panel creates for the reviewee. The Review Panel should probably use the beginning blurb as well as all the questions.


The following are basic questions that will be in any review. Some of them might be redundant due to questions in the reviewee-specific section, but please answer anyway. There's also a section for positive and "room for improvement" comments on these items at the bottom. Please fill out those sections, too.

1 = never/poor
3 = about half the time/so-so
5 = all the time/absolutely wonderful

Arrives on time or calls if going to be late: 1 2 3 4 5

Is efficient and makes good use of time: 1 2 3 4 5

Uses the phone, socializes, and takes breaks at appropriate times: 1 2 3 4 5

Aware of safety on the job: 1 2 3 4 5

Leaves volunteer-inhabited areas clean and ready for next shift: 1 2 3 4 5

Actively participates in meetings: 1 2 3 4 5

Is a reliable member of standing committee: 1 2 3 4 5

Puts the interests of Free Geek before personal interests while working: 1 2 3 4 5

Makes volunteers and donors feel welcome, actively reaches out: 1 2 3 4 5

Actively involves volunteers in appropriate projects: 1 2 3 4 5

Courteous and friendly: 1 2 3 4 5

Listens to volunteers/donors and tries to meet their needs: 1 2 3 4 5

Communicates effectively with other staff/core concerning needs of his/her area: 1 2 3 4 5

Accurately assesses her/his own abilities and constraints when taking on commitments: 1 2 3 4 5

Follows through with commitments: 1 2 3 4 5

Gives and recieves constructive criticism: 1 2 3 4 5

Communicates directly to solve conflict: 1 2 3 4 5

Appropriately uses the standard tools Free Geek has available to do her/his job*: 1 2 3 4 5

Offers a safe space to communicate if issues arise: 1 2 3 4 5

How do you rate xxx's overall performance: 1 2 3 4 5

  • These tools might include email lists, RT, the wiki, bulletin boards, etc.


(Do you support changing xxx's probationary collective status to permanent at this time, and Why, or why not?:)(use only if applicable)

Any suggestions for goals or professional objectives this person could work on for their next review?

Any additional comments for xxx? If you write your name after your comment in this section, it will be included in the form the reviewee will read.