Difference between revisions of "How to approve/deny grants"

From FreekiWiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Line 26: Line 26:
  
  
==4.  Make sure the requestor is associated with the organization and that they have the authority to make the grant request.==
+
==5.  Make sure the requestor is The one recent exception is a non-profit in Mexico.  The head of this organization visited Free Geek in person, all of the computers are driven from Free Geek to the program sites, and they presented us with a tax-exempt certificate from the Mexican government.  They also provide us with photographs and on-going reports of their progress.--[[User:Elizabethwt|Elizabethwt]] 22:36, 25 August 2011 (UTC)associated with the organization and that they have the authority to make the grant request.==
  
 
*What is their role at the organization?  If they are a volunteer, you should probably check with a staff member to make sure that the volunteer is following proper channels.
 
*What is their role at the organization?  If they are a volunteer, you should probably check with a staff member to make sure that the volunteer is following proper channels.
Line 86: Line 86:
  
 
To date, no one has refused.  If they did, we wouldn't grant to them.  Because that would be mean of them.  And we don't grant to meanies.
 
To date, no one has refused.  If they did, we wouldn't grant to them.  Because that would be mean of them.  And we don't grant to meanies.
Use this flow chart to approve and deny grants.
 
<div>
 
  
<graphviz>
+
=Exceptions=
  digraph D {
 
  
  node [fontname="Helvetica", fontsize="11"]
+
==Exceptions to the no foreign organizations rule==
  edge [fontname="Helvetica"]
 
  
  start        [label="START HERE", shape="box", style="bold"]
+
The one recent exception is a non-profit in Mexico. The head of this organization visited Free Geek in person, all of the computers are driven from Free Geek to the program sites, and they presented us with a tax-exempt certificate from the Mexican governmentThey also provide us with photographs and on-going reports of their progress.--[[User:Elizabethwt|Elizabethwt]] 22:36, 25 August 2011 (UTC)
  reject        [label="Reject", shape="box", style="bold", color="red", URL="http://wiki.freegeek.org/index.php/Hardware_Grants_Responses#Rejected"]
 
  approveinst  [label="Approve", shape="box", style="bold", color="green", URL="http://wiki.freegeek.org/index.php/Hardware_Grants_Responses#Easy_items"]
 
  approvewait  [label="Approve", shape="box", style="bold", color="yellow", URL="http://wiki.freegeek.org/index.php/Hardware_Grants_Responses#Weird_Items.2FWaitlist"]
 
  take          [label="Take the oldest ticket first."]
 
  USorCan      [label="Are they located in the US or Canada?"]
 
  local        [label="Do they have a local area contact?"]
 
  contact      [label="Make sure the requester is associated with the organization."]
 
  disburse      [label="Check the database. Have we disbursed to them before?"]4.   
 
  PPS          [label="Is the grant for a Portland Public School?"]
 
  PPSIT        [label="Contact PPS IT."]
 
  eligibility  [label="What kind of organization are they?"]
 
  ineligible    [label="Partisan\nFor-profit\nIndividual"]
 
  eligible      [label="Non-profit\nChurch\nSchool\nSocial Change\nCommunity Center\nCollective"]
 
  redflag      [label="Are there any red flags?"]
 
  verify        [label="Verify that the organization is legitimate."]
 
  assess        [label="Assess their need"]
 
  easy          [label="PCs\nKeyboards\nMice\nPower cords\nShort network cables"]
 
  medium        [label="Macintoshes*\nLaptops*\nLCDs*\nCRTs*\nPrinters*\nNetwork Devices\nRAM\nHard Drives"]
 
  hard          [label="Projectors\nSpeakers)\nLong network cables"]
 
  
  start        -> take
+
==Exceptions to the no for-profits rule==
  take        -> USorCan
 
  USorCan      -> reject [taillabel="No"]
 
  USorCan      -> local [taillabel="Yes"]
 
  local        -> reject [taillabel="No"]
 
  local        -> contact [taillabel="Yes"]
 
  contact      -> PPS [taillabel="Yes"]
 
  contact      -> reject [taillabel="No"]
 
  PPS          -> PPSIT [taillabel="Yes"]
 
  PPS          -> disburse [taillabel="No"]
 
  disburse    -> eligibility [taillabel="No"]
 
  disburse    -> assess [taillabel="Yes"]
 
  eligibility  -> ineligible
 
  ineligible  -> reject
 
  eligibility  -> eligible
 
  eligible    -> redflag
 
  redflag      -> verify [taillabel="Yes"]
 
*Community Centers
 
  redflag      -> assess [taillabel="No"]
 
  verify      -> assess [taillabel="Legitimate"]
 
  verify      -> reject [label="Not legitimate"]
 
  assess      -> easy
 
  assess      -> medium
 
  assess      -> hard
 
  easy        -> approveinst
 
  medium      -> approvewait
 
*Community Centers
 
  hard        -> reject
 
 
 
    }
 
 
 
</graphviz>
 
  
  *There is a waiting list for Macintoshes, laptops, CRT Monitors, LCD Monitors, and Printers. Other items on that list just need to be gathered.
+
I made one exception by approving a grant for about a dozen broken VCRs to Intel for a school program. This was a good decision as the VCRs had one final hurrah before becoming CBM and the grant was for educational purposes. I also made an exception by granting some disassembled hard drives (without the platters) to a for-profit digital data storage company to use in a tabling displayI wouldn't do this again as, in retrospect, the grant advanced the for-profit interests of the company and not an educational agenda.--[[User:Elizabethwt|Elizabethwt]] 00:57, 26 August 2011 (UTC)
  We do not always have these items.
 
  
</div>
+
==Exceptions to the no individual rule==
  
==Verifying the contact's association with an organization==
+
We sometimes approve "pass through" grants, where organizations give computers to individuals.  These grants are deprioritized, meaning that if human and/or hardware resources are strained, we first fill organizational grants.  These grants should only be approved if the population being served is too far away to come volunteer and earn their own computers.  Another factor to consider is whether or not the "pass through" organization will be providing computer education to the eventual users.
1. Do they have an organizational e-mail?
 
  
2. Is their name on the website or on the organizations entry in the [[Business registrars]]?
 
 
3. If the answer to both of the above questions is "no", call another contact from the website or [[Business registrars]] if possible.  Can they vouch for the person who contacted Free Geek?
 
 
 
==Contacting PPS IT==
 
 
*Email Jed Gilchrist, head of PPS IT. jgilchri at pps.k12.or.us
 
 
==Red Flags==
 
These signs should make us look more closely at a grant.  They do *not* mean that a grant is in ineligible.
 
 
*Anything that seems a little "off", including:
 
**Non-organizational e-mail
 
**No extra contacts provided
 
**Not in the business registry or not listed as "Public Benefit"
 
**Shipping materials overseas
 
**Vague purpose for equipment
 
**Vague purpose of organization
 
 
==Options For Verifying Grants==
 
Unless we've granted to an organization before, we should always be checking the [[Business registrars]].
 
 
If there are any red flags, you can use some of the following to determine whether or not an organization is legitimate:
 
*Check website.
 
*Check contacts from website: like board members, other people in positions of leadership.
 
*Ask for paperwork like brochures, etc.
 
*Ask to see organizational plan.
 
*Interview them about projects, past, present, and future.
 
*Ask them about what they intend to use the equipment for
 
*Check in Guidestar or Charity Navigator
 
*Ask them to produce their Certificate showing that they are a 501(c)3 organization (only works if you are a 501(c)3 organization)
 
*Use whois command in commandline to figure out who owns the website.
 
 
[[Category:Hardware Grants]]
 
[[Category:Hardware Grants]]

Revision as of 17:57, 25 August 2011

1. Are they located in the US or Canada?

If not, pass this ticket on to the Grants Coordinator. We are generally not approving grants for organizations that are not headquartered in the US or Canada.

The one recent exception is a non-profit in Mexico. The head of this organization visited Free Geek in person, all of the computers are driven from Free Geek to the program sites, and they presented us with a tax-exempt certificate from the Mexican government. They also provide us with photographs and on-going reports of their progress.--Elizabethwt 22:36, 25 August 2011 (UTC)

2. Do they have a local area contact?

If not, the request is rejected. We do not have the resources to ship computers or prepare them for shipping. If a grantee says that they have a local area contact, but are located a significant distance away (i.e. you would usually take a plane to get there), ask them to elaborate on their plan for getting the grant to their location.

3. Do they directly or indirectly support candidates running for office?

If the answer to this question is "yes", the grant is denied.

From at: RT #59 "Decided 8/26: 'Our 501(c)(3) status prevents us from granting to candidates running for office or organizations supporting candidates running for office.'"

I think we should add a question to our grant application: "Does your organization directly or indirectly support candidates running for office?" Proof of an organization's 501(c)3 status is the only sure way we have of verifying this that I am aware of..--Elizabethwt 00:02, 26 August 2011 (UTC)

4. Is the grantee part of an organization that we have a special approval process for?

  • Portland Public Schools: e-mail Jed Gilchrist, head of PPS IT. jgilchri at pps.k12.or.us
  • Oxford Houses: call Curt Rice, Housing Services Representative for the Oxford Houses of Oregon. His number is available in RT.


5. Make sure the requestor is The one recent exception is a non-profit in Mexico. The head of this organization visited Free Geek in person, all of the computers are driven from Free Geek to the program sites, and they presented us with a tax-exempt certificate from the Mexican government. They also provide us with photographs and on-going reports of their progress.--Elizabethwt 22:36, 25 August 2011 (UTC)associated with the organization and that they have the authority to make the grant request.

  • What is their role at the organization? If they are a volunteer, you should probably check with a staff member to make sure that the volunteer is following proper channels.
  • Do they have an organizational e-mail?
  • If you cannot determine if the contact is associated with the organization or whether or not they have the authority to make the grant request, call another contact from the website or Business registrars if possible. Can they vouch for the person who contacted Free Geek?

6. Are they in their respective state's business registry and are they listed as a non-profit, public benefit, religious or educational organization?

Here are the business registrars. If the business registry seems to indicate that the organization is for-profit or partisan, the organization may not be eligible.


7. If they aren't in the business registrars, do they fall into one of our eligible categories?

These types of organizations are eligible for grants:

  • Non-profits (non-partisan)
  • Churches
  • Schools
  • Social Change Organizations
  • Community Centers
  • Collectives

These types of organizations are (usually) ineligible:

  • For-profit
  • Individuals
  • Partisan (always ineligible)

Here are some suggestions for checking an organizations legitimacy.

  • See if we have granted to them before. This does not automatically mean that an organization is legitimate (we might have made a mistake in the past), but it will give you an idea of what research has already been done and what our relationship with them is like.
  • Check website.
  • Check contacts from website: like board members, other people in positions of leadership.
  • Ask for paperwork like brochures, etc.
  • Ask to see organizational plan.
  • Interview them about projects, past, present, and future.
  • Ask them about what they intend to use the equipment for
  • Check in Guidestar or Charity Navigator
  • Ask them to produce their Certificate showing that they are a 501(c)3 organization (only works if you are a 501(c)3 organization)
  • Use whois command in commandline to figure out who owns the website.

8. What kind of hardware do they need? What are they going to use it for? Is this hardware that we can provide?

Check the Hardware Grants What We Can Give Out List.

What kind of software are they planning to use? For most things, Ubuntu works great, but for an organization that wants to run Windows 7, a Freebox won't cut it. An FG-PDX will, but they have to be FG-PDX eligible.

This is also a great time to check RT and see if we have donated to them in the past. If the organization wants laptops or LCDs make sure that they are not going to go over the 3 per 3 months limit.

9. Are they taking the hardware overseas?

Some organizations with domestic headquarters work abroad. While we can generally verify the legitimacy of these organizations, shipping computers abroad and disposing of them properly pose potential problems. My informal policy has been to grant organizations that will be taking computers abroad 3 laptops, provided that they will be carried (not shipped) to the program site and that the organization commits to bringing them back to the US for recycling. We have no way of tracking that these things actually occur, but by sending out small numbers of laptops we are able to support these organizations, while limiting our potential negative impact on the environment.--Elizabethwt 00:42, 26 August 2011 (UTC)

10. Do they have a reasonable plan for disposing of the hardware in an environmental fashion?

Review the answer to the related question on the application. Follow up with the grant recipient if necessary.

11. Have they agreed to fill out our 3 month survey?

To date, no one has refused. If they did, we wouldn't grant to them. Because that would be mean of them. And we don't grant to meanies.

Exceptions

Exceptions to the no foreign organizations rule

The one recent exception is a non-profit in Mexico. The head of this organization visited Free Geek in person, all of the computers are driven from Free Geek to the program sites, and they presented us with a tax-exempt certificate from the Mexican government. They also provide us with photographs and on-going reports of their progress.--Elizabethwt 22:36, 25 August 2011 (UTC)

Exceptions to the no for-profits rule

I made one exception by approving a grant for about a dozen broken VCRs to Intel for a school program. This was a good decision as the VCRs had one final hurrah before becoming CBM and the grant was for educational purposes. I also made an exception by granting some disassembled hard drives (without the platters) to a for-profit digital data storage company to use in a tabling display. I wouldn't do this again as, in retrospect, the grant advanced the for-profit interests of the company and not an educational agenda.--Elizabethwt 00:57, 26 August 2011 (UTC)

Exceptions to the no individual rule

We sometimes approve "pass through" grants, where organizations give computers to individuals. These grants are deprioritized, meaning that if human and/or hardware resources are strained, we first fill organizational grants. These grants should only be approved if the population being served is too far away to come volunteer and earn their own computers. Another factor to consider is whether or not the "pass through" organization will be providing computer education to the eventual users.