Difference between revisions of "Talk:Carryovers"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
m |
|||
| Line 8: | Line 8: | ||
[[User:Rfs|RfS]] 12:44, 13 Jun 2006 (PDT) | [[User:Rfs|RfS]] 12:44, 13 Jun 2006 (PDT) | ||
| + | |||
| + | |||
| + | : i just referred to this page in an email to council, and linked the meeting template to it. any ideas about how we can start integrating these questions into the culture/script? i mean, if council likes my 10 minute training proposal, i can do one that includes commitments... but that would be just one council meeting. mainly we need facilitator awareness. --[[User:Ideath|Ideath]] | ||
Latest revision as of 13:05, 13 June 2006
We should ask people these questions, since folks might not be aware of this policy and thus not offer the information.
Also, in staff meetings, we've started adding a plus sign in the minutes whenever a committment is carried over. Old committments look like this:
Richard said he's install a skyhook in Receiving. +++++++++
...because the more times it carries over, the more +s it gets. This makes the old carryovers stand out like a sore thumb.
RfS 12:44, 13 Jun 2006 (PDT)
- i just referred to this page in an email to council, and linked the meeting template to it. any ideas about how we can start integrating these questions into the culture/script? i mean, if council likes my 10 minute training proposal, i can do one that includes commitments... but that would be just one council meeting. mainly we need facilitator awareness. --Ideath