Difference between revisions of "Talk:Keyholders"
(Question) |
|||
| Line 9: | Line 9: | ||
: Nope, but we did reserve those firstly numbered keys for the staff collective and you ended up with Christen's as a convenience. Whatev. [[User:Rfs|RfS]] 12:37, 15 Apr 2006 (PDT) | : Nope, but we did reserve those firstly numbered keys for the staff collective and you ended up with Christen's as a convenience. Whatev. [[User:Rfs|RfS]] 12:37, 15 Apr 2006 (PDT) | ||
| + | |||
| + | I am guessing that the I in (#11E/I) indicats I key. Some non staff people have (#??E/I) who are not staff makeing the lists a little confusing (but not to bad). When the new keys come out can we combine the lists, or break them apart again? [[User:Matteo|Matteo]] 08:43, 26 September 2006 (PDT) | ||
Revision as of 08:43, 26 September 2006
I am wondering what category for this page. HR? Sould there be a locks category? or security? MW 14:04, 13 Sep 2005 (PDT)
Probably should be protected, as that list is somewhat important. --Jeff
- Good suggestion. done. MW 08:06, 14 Sep 2005 (PDT)
Why, oh why, did we get rid of the lockbox? Seems like lost keys are more of a security threat than a lockbox. And i don't want extra keys to carry around. --Ideath 14:38, 20 Sep 2005 (PDT)
just having a staff collective member key makes me a member of staff? Vagrant 22:58, 14 Apr 2006 (PDT)
- Nope, but we did reserve those firstly numbered keys for the staff collective and you ended up with Christen's as a convenience. Whatev. RfS 12:37, 15 Apr 2006 (PDT)
I am guessing that the I in (#11E/I) indicats I key. Some non staff people have (#??E/I) who are not staff makeing the lists a little confusing (but not to bad). When the new keys come out can we combine the lists, or break them apart again? Matteo 08:43, 26 September 2006 (PDT)