Difference between revisions of "Layoffs and Hours Reduction"

From FreekiWiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Line 1: Line 1:
 
PROPOSAL:
 
PROPOSAL:
In the event of a looming financial problem that would require a cut in staff
 
costs, the HR committee would nominate an ad hoc committee.  Staff would
 
dicuss and approve the appointments of the individuals on the committee.  The
 
ad hoc committee will digest the issues involved and make a report to staff
 
suggesting a way to proceed.
 
Ways to determine where to make the cuts (in the order they should be
 
utilized):
 
  
1) Wage reduction; Voluntary hours cut
+
In the event of a looming financial problem that would require a cut in staff costs, the HR committee would nominate an ad hoc committee.  Staff would discuss and approve the appointments of the individuals on the committee.  The
 +
ad hoc committee will digest the issues involved and make a report to staff suggesting a way to proceed.
 +
Ways to determine where to make the cuts (in the order they should be used):
  
2) Merit-based.  The organization is most important here.  - make department  
+
# Wage reduction; Voluntary hours cut
audit? Use review data? Person's program is costing money: this nominates  
+
# Merit-based.  The organization is most important here.  - make department audit? Use review data? Person's program is costing money: this nominates them for cuts? Operational impact? Financial impact? What would happen if X person didn't show up for work tomorrow?  What would happen if X program was cancelled tomorrow? Possibility of shuffling people to other positions.  Is there some overlapping job functionality that could be eliminated?
them for cuts? Operational impact? Financial impact? What would happen if X  
+
# Seniority - after the other two methods above have been used.  Possibly as tie-breaker.
person didn't show up for work tomorrow?  What would happen if X program was  
 
cancelled tomorrow? Possibility of shuffling people to other positions.  Is  
 
there some overlapping job functionality that could be eliminated?
 
 
 
3) Seniority - after the other two methods above have been used.  Possibly as  
 
tie-breaker.
 

Revision as of 19:02, 14 January 2005

PROPOSAL:

In the event of a looming financial problem that would require a cut in staff costs, the HR committee would nominate an ad hoc committee. Staff would discuss and approve the appointments of the individuals on the committee. The ad hoc committee will digest the issues involved and make a report to staff suggesting a way to proceed. Ways to determine where to make the cuts (in the order they should be used):

  1. Wage reduction; Voluntary hours cut
  2. Merit-based. The organization is most important here. - make department audit? Use review data? Person's program is costing money: this nominates them for cuts? Operational impact? Financial impact? What would happen if X person didn't show up for work tomorrow? What would happen if X program was cancelled tomorrow? Possibility of shuffling people to other positions. Is there some overlapping job functionality that could be eliminated?
  3. Seniority - after the other two methods above have been used. Possibly as tie-breaker.