Difference between revisions of "Talk:Reuse and Recycling through 2005"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
− | + | The following table makes no sense - the "years" heading has no years below it, and the "total" heading...Why would we want "totals" of both intaken stuff and outgoing stuff? That would mean things get counted twice...I don't understand... [[User:Halfasspete|Pete]] | |
+ | |||
+ | : I think Pete's referring to in part the ''Overall Rates of Reuse and Recycling'' section, where the total doesn't make sense. A total of ''Gizmos | ||
+ | Reused'' and ''Gizmos Recycled'' would make sense, but including ''Received'' in that does not. Of course the numbers are a bit suspicious: | ||
+ | |||
+ | <pre> | ||
+ | Reused Recycled Total Received | ||
+ | Systems 7,029 25,582 32,611 17,069 | ||
+ | Monitors 6,998 19,625 26,623 8,408 | ||
+ | Printers 3,342 11,471 14,813 8,045 | ||
+ | </pre> | ||
+ | |||
+ | : Here the total is of the first two columns. It looks like we're disposing of 2-3 times as much stuff as we actually get. Something's wrong there. | ||
+ | : [[User:Rfs|RfS]] 12:14, 27 October 2006 (PDT) |
Revision as of 12:14, 27 October 2006
The following table makes no sense - the "years" heading has no years below it, and the "total" heading...Why would we want "totals" of both intaken stuff and outgoing stuff? That would mean things get counted twice...I don't understand... Pete
- I think Pete's referring to in part the Overall Rates of Reuse and Recycling section, where the total doesn't make sense. A total of Gizmos
Reused and Gizmos Recycled would make sense, but including Received in that does not. Of course the numbers are a bit suspicious:
Reused Recycled Total Received Systems 7,029 25,582 32,611 17,069 Monitors 6,998 19,625 26,623 8,408 Printers 3,342 11,471 14,813 8,045
- Here the total is of the first two columns. It looks like we're disposing of 2-3 times as much stuff as we actually get. Something's wrong there.
- RfS 12:14, 27 October 2006 (PDT)