Difference between revisions of "Talk:Old NAP Proposal"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
(Clarification?) |
|||
| Line 6: | Line 6: | ||
* I think (some minor flaws aside) the Hardware Grants program is working OK. | * I think (some minor flaws aside) the Hardware Grants program is working OK. | ||
* Would there be then two groups Hardware Grants and NAP? (If so, it sounds kind of like overkill.) | * Would there be then two groups Hardware Grants and NAP? (If so, it sounds kind of like overkill.) | ||
| + | * It seems like it would be harder for a NP to "just get a computer" from us this way. | ||
* As to the biggest flaw in the Hardware Grants process (takes a long time), how does this address that? (That is, why will shepherds respond more quickly if the queue/group/email list is called NAP, rather than hardware grants?) | * As to the biggest flaw in the Hardware Grants process (takes a long time), how does this address that? (That is, why will shepherds respond more quickly if the queue/group/email list is called NAP, rather than hardware grants?) | ||
[[User:Rfs|rfs]] 09:09, 21 Jan 2005 (PST) | [[User:Rfs|rfs]] 09:09, 21 Jan 2005 (PST) | ||
Revision as of 10:11, 21 January 2005
Is this a counter-proposal to the already in process "Future of Collab" proposal, or is it just a change in how hardware grants would work?
If it's a change in how the Hardware Grants program works, then a few of things:
- It seems like the place for the proposal would be the Hardware Grants group and not the Council.
- I think (some minor flaws aside) the Hardware Grants program is working OK.
- Would there be then two groups Hardware Grants and NAP? (If so, it sounds kind of like overkill.)
- It seems like it would be harder for a NP to "just get a computer" from us this way.
- As to the biggest flaw in the Hardware Grants process (takes a long time), how does this address that? (That is, why will shepherds respond more quickly if the queue/group/email list is called NAP, rather than hardware grants?)
rfs 09:09, 21 Jan 2005 (PST)