Layoffs and Hours Reduction

From FreekiWiki
Revision as of 17:56, 14 January 2005 by Rfs (talk | contribs)
(diff) ← Older revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)
Jump to navigation Jump to search

- Layoff/hrs reduction policy Discussion: Possible ways to reduce hours: seniority, merit, voluntary, eliminate overlapping job functionality hours (where there's cocoordinators) For merit-based, we must have some fair, hard and fast criteria; in long run, best for organization as a whole, but can cause lots of interpersonal harm Seniority: easy to determine HR could make report to staff that kind of pre-digests the issues involved Wage reduction should be considered first, and if untenable, then move on to other options If we sense there'll be a problem, we could nominate or call for an ad hoc committee to present the options. Staff would decide.

PROPOSAL: In the event of a looming financial problem that would require a cut in staff costs, the HR committee would nominate an ad hoc committee. Staff would dicuss and approve the appointments of the individuals on the committee. The ad hoc committee will digest the issues involved and make a report to staff suggesting a way to proceed. Ways to determine where to make the cuts (in the order they should be utilized): 1) Wage reduction; Voluntary hours cut 2) Merit-based. The organization is most important here. - make department audit? Use review data? Person's program is costing money: this nominates them for cuts? Operational impact? Financial impact? What would happen if X person didn't show up for work tomorrow? What would happen if X program was cancelled tomorrow? Possibility of shuffling people to other positions. Is there some overlapping job functionality that could be eliminated? 3) Seniority - after the other two methods above have been used. Possibly as tie-breaker.