Difference between revisions of "Lesson Plan for Teaching the Consensus Process"

From FreekiWiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(basics - no formatting)
 
Line 1: Line 1:
6:05pm
+
This is an example outline for a quick introduction to Consensus decision-making.  The training should take about 1.5 hours.
Shawn
 
- Quick check-ins, intros, announcements
 
  
OVERVIEW OF WHAT WE’RE DOING TONIGHT
+
==Intros==
Agenda
+
5 minutes
Groundrules
+
*Names
Hold on to your questions until the end -- you may get your answer later on in the presentation
 
Anything else?
 
  
6:15pm
+
==Overview and Groundrules==
Shawn
+
5 minutes
WHAT IS CONSENSUS?
+
* Review agenda
Decision-making process whereby everyone in the group either agrees with or is neutral on a decision.  It is more than a 100% vote -- it is a decision that everyone in the group can live with, and the majority of the group feels good about and invested in.
+
* Groundrules:
For it to happen right, we follow a certain structure of proposing ideas, running meetings, discussing proposals and deciding on proposals that helps make sure the decisions we make are solid, smart, and reflective of the group’s will.
+
* Hold on to your questions until the end -- you may get your answer later on in the presentation
A group using consensus requires a culture of cooperation, openness and involvement.
 
  
WHAT’S SO GREAT ABOUT CONSENSUS, ANYWAY?
+
==What is Consensus?==
Decisions are made that everyone feels invested in.
+
5 minutes
Sometimes everybody is wrong on something, but one person has a key insight or feeling that leads to the right decision; that lone voice is usually silent in Majority-Rules decisions.  Quaker saying “Everyone has a piece of the truth”.  Everyone can be wrong; everyone can be the watchdog.
+
* Decision-making process whereby everyone in the group either agrees with or is neutral on a decision. It is more than a 100% vote -- it is a decision that everyone in the group can live with, and the majority of the group feels good about and invested in.  
It’s great of intense/intimate groups (like co-housing!) because it forces us to work better together, respect everyone’s needs, and keep everyone involved.
+
* For it to happen right, we follow a certain structure of proposing ideas, running meetings, discussing proposals and deciding on proposals that helps make sure the decisions we make are solid, smart, and reflective of the group’s will.
 +
* A group using consensus requires a culture of cooperation, openness and involvement.  
  
EVERYONE READ KATHEY SUTTER’S FOLDOUT, “13 Steps to Consensus and Solidarity”
+
==What's so great about Consensus?==
 +
5 minutes
 +
* Decisions are made that everyone feels invested in.
 +
* Sometimes everybody is wrong on something, but one person has a key insight or feeling that leads to the right decision;  that lone voice is usually silent in Majority-Rules decisions.  Quaker saying “Everyone has a piece of the truth”.  Everyone can be wrong; everyone can be the watchdog.
 +
* It’s great for groups that have to work together often and in an intense way because it forces us to work better together, respect everyone’s needs, and keep everyone involved.
  
6:30pm
+
==Review Kathey Sutter's brochure, “13 Steps to Consensus and Solidarity”==
SF & DL
+
10 minutes
Open for clarifying questions
+
* Keep in mind that the complete process is for complex, involved, important decisions.
  
6:35pm
+
==Open for clarifying questions==
Daniel
+
10 minutes
HOW DO WE DO CONSENSUS?
 
Meeting Structure (Proposal - Discussion - Decision: different forms, long and short)
 
Basis for decisions:
 
membership structure and quorum
 
Kinds of PROPOSALS and DECISIONS
 
small issues & big issues
 
strawpolls and ‘testing for consensus’
 
Formal Consensus:  Assents, Stand-Asides, Blocks
 
Kinds of DISCUSSIONS (and basic guidelines)
 
Formal Discussion and Guided Discussion
 
Freeform; Quick Discussion
 
Brainstorm; creative stuff
 
Other tools
 
Committees: ad hoc and standing; decision-making authority should be defined by whole group
 
???
 
Facilitation and Interaction
 
Role of the Facilitator, Scribe, Participant, etc.
 
Hand signals
 
  
6:55pm
+
==How do we make decisions by consensus?==
SF & DL
+
20 minutes
Open for clarifying questions
 
  
7:00pm
+
===Before the meeting===
???
+
* Facilitator and scribe chosen
OK, HOW DOES THIS *REALLY* WORK IN PRACTICE?
+
* Agenda emailed out for additions a week before meeting
Impediments to Consensus
 
lack of participation
 
possible solution: ask for individuals' opinions during meeting; talk with them after meeting if bigger problem
 
dissatisfaction with the process / poor facilitation
 
possible solution: speak up!  everyone in group can play a role in helping facilitate and move things along
 
individuals not willing to compromise
 
possible solution: require good reasons for witholding support: it shouldn't be personal
 
power imbalance in the group out of hand
 
possible solution: bring it up to trusted friend; bring it to group in a balanced way – others probably agree
 
overriding lack of trust within the group
 
possible solution: often caused by something else and needs to be addressed outside of meeting
 
lack of openness about feelings & assumptions
 
individuals not committed to Consensus process
 
possible solution: group needs to discuss reasons why and address them
 
lack of common vision in the group
 
  
Different forms of Consensus:
+
===Meeting Structure (Proposal - Discussion - Decision: different forms, long and short)===
Consensus Minus One (you must have at least 2 to block)
+
* Basis for decisions:
Try for Consensus, settle for 2/3 or ¾
+
** Membership structure and quorum
Notas: these alternative forms of consensus can be used all the time, used for only specific, defined decisions, or as a consistent fallback plan.
+
* Kinds of PROPOSALS and DECISIONS
These alternatives are often used for groups of 20 and larger (on tougher decisions, consensus can be hard for this many to reach).  Working hard on including everyone can be difficult but rewarding.
+
** small issues & big issues
 +
** strawpolls and ‘testing for consensus’
 +
* Formal Consensus: Assents, Stand-Asides, Blocks
 +
* Kinds of DISCUSSIONS (and basic guidelines)
 +
** Formal Discussion and Guided Discussion
 +
** Freeform; Quick Discussion
 +
** Brainstorm; creative stuff
 +
* Other tools
 +
** Committees: ad hoc and standing; decision-making authority should be defined by whole group
  
07:10:00 pm
+
===Facilitation and Interaction===
SF & DL
+
* Role of the Facilitator, Scribe, Participant, etc.
Open for questions
+
* Hand signals
  
07:20:00 pm
+
===Post-meeting===
SF & DL
+
* Scribe posts minutes asap
PRACTICE CONSENSUS DECISION
+
* Corrections to minutes: reply to the group with corrections
  
Shawn presents a fake proposal; Daniel will facilitate.  (20 minutes)
+
==Open for clarifying questions==
 +
5 minutes
  
 +
==How does this ''really'' work in practice?==
 +
10 minutes
  
7:35pm
+
===Impediments to Consensus===
???
+
The following suggestions are inclusive of those on the [[Meeting Tips]] page.  If you're leading this training and you have time, you might want to ask the group for impediments they've seen and what they did about it.
DISCUSSIONOK, what process do we want to use for OUR group?
+
 
+
;People are holding back
7:50pm
+
:Call on people who haven't spoken, even if they havne't put their hands up
???
+
 
Remaining Co-housing Group business.
+
;Dissatisfaction with the process / poor facilitation
 +
:Speak up! Everyone in group can play a role in helping facilitate and move things along
 +
 
 +
;Individuals not willing to compromise
 +
:Require good reasons for witholding support: it shouldn't be personal
 +
 
 +
;Several people are talking at the same time.
 +
:Make people raise hands and call them in turn. Keep a list on the board if there are too many people to keep track of.
 +
 
 +
;Someone is dominating the conversation.
 +
:Ask that people who have spoken not speak until everyone else has. If that doesn't help, use a go around instead of keeping a list. Sometimes just asking the person to hold back makes the most sense.
 +
 
 +
;People are repeating each other's points.
 +
:Often all the facilitator needs to do is point out the obvious here. Remind people that they don't need to repeat each other's points.
 +
 
 +
;People are going off topic.
 +
:The facilitator can remind people what the topic is. New items can be added to the end of the agenda.
 +
 
 +
;People aren't listening to each other.
 +
:Ask people to summarize each other's points. This forces them to listen.
 +
 
 +
;The meeting is too chaotic.
 +
:This ususally means that several of the above problems are happening at the same time, and usually means the faciliator isn't doing their job. Remind the facilitator that it's their job to keep the conversation on topic and productive.
 +
 
 +
;People are unprepared.
 +
:There's not a lot that can be done at the meeting, but a good facilitator can be chosen for the next meeting and take extra time ahead of it to make certain that presenters are chosen, and then reminded (or nagged) into being ready next time.
 +
 
 +
===Different forms of Consensus===
 +
* Consensus Minus One (you must have at least 2 to block)
 +
* Try for Consensus, settle for 2/3 or 3/4
 +
* ''Notas'':  
 +
** These alternative forms of consensus can be used all the time, used for only specific, defined decisions, or as a consistent fallback plan.
 +
** These alternatives are often used for groups of 20 and larger (on tougher decisions, consensus can be hard for this many to reach).  Working hard on including everyone can be difficult but rewarding.
 +
 
 +
==Practice Consensus Decision==
 +
10 minutes
 +
 
 +
==Open for final questions/discussion==
 +
10 minutes
 +
 
 +
 
 +
[[Category:Meetings]]

Revision as of 01:25, 4 January 2006

This is an example outline for a quick introduction to Consensus decision-making. The training should take about 1.5 hours.

Intros

5 minutes

  • Names

Overview and Groundrules

5 minutes

  • Review agenda
  • Groundrules:
  • Hold on to your questions until the end -- you may get your answer later on in the presentation

What is Consensus?

5 minutes

  • Decision-making process whereby everyone in the group either agrees with or is neutral on a decision. It is more than a 100% vote -- it is a decision that everyone in the group can live with, and the majority of the group feels good about and invested in.
  • For it to happen right, we follow a certain structure of proposing ideas, running meetings, discussing proposals and deciding on proposals that helps make sure the decisions we make are solid, smart, and reflective of the group’s will.
  • A group using consensus requires a culture of cooperation, openness and involvement.

What's so great about Consensus?

5 minutes

  • Decisions are made that everyone feels invested in.
  • Sometimes everybody is wrong on something, but one person has a key insight or feeling that leads to the right decision; that lone voice is usually silent in Majority-Rules decisions. Quaker saying “Everyone has a piece of the truth”. Everyone can be wrong; everyone can be the watchdog.
  • It’s great for groups that have to work together often and in an intense way because it forces us to work better together, respect everyone’s needs, and keep everyone involved.

Review Kathey Sutter's brochure, “13 Steps to Consensus and Solidarity”

10 minutes

  • Keep in mind that the complete process is for complex, involved, important decisions.

Open for clarifying questions

10 minutes

How do we make decisions by consensus?

20 minutes

Before the meeting

  • Facilitator and scribe chosen
  • Agenda emailed out for additions a week before meeting

Meeting Structure (Proposal - Discussion - Decision: different forms, long and short)

  • Basis for decisions:
    • Membership structure and quorum
  • Kinds of PROPOSALS and DECISIONS
    • small issues & big issues
    • strawpolls and ‘testing for consensus’
  • Formal Consensus: Assents, Stand-Asides, Blocks
  • Kinds of DISCUSSIONS (and basic guidelines)
    • Formal Discussion and Guided Discussion
    • Freeform; Quick Discussion
    • Brainstorm; creative stuff
  • Other tools
    • Committees: ad hoc and standing; decision-making authority should be defined by whole group

Facilitation and Interaction

  • Role of the Facilitator, Scribe, Participant, etc.
  • Hand signals

Post-meeting

  • Scribe posts minutes asap
  • Corrections to minutes: reply to the group with corrections

Open for clarifying questions

5 minutes

How does this really work in practice?

10 minutes

Impediments to Consensus

The following suggestions are inclusive of those on the Meeting Tips page. If you're leading this training and you have time, you might want to ask the group for impediments they've seen and what they did about it.

People are holding back
Call on people who haven't spoken, even if they havne't put their hands up
Dissatisfaction with the process / poor facilitation
Speak up! Everyone in group can play a role in helping facilitate and move things along
Individuals not willing to compromise
Require good reasons for witholding support: it shouldn't be personal
Several people are talking at the same time.
Make people raise hands and call them in turn. Keep a list on the board if there are too many people to keep track of.
Someone is dominating the conversation.
Ask that people who have spoken not speak until everyone else has. If that doesn't help, use a go around instead of keeping a list. Sometimes just asking the person to hold back makes the most sense.
People are repeating each other's points.
Often all the facilitator needs to do is point out the obvious here. Remind people that they don't need to repeat each other's points.
People are going off topic.
The facilitator can remind people what the topic is. New items can be added to the end of the agenda.
People aren't listening to each other.
Ask people to summarize each other's points. This forces them to listen.
The meeting is too chaotic.
This ususally means that several of the above problems are happening at the same time, and usually means the faciliator isn't doing their job. Remind the facilitator that it's their job to keep the conversation on topic and productive.
People are unprepared.
There's not a lot that can be done at the meeting, but a good facilitator can be chosen for the next meeting and take extra time ahead of it to make certain that presenters are chosen, and then reminded (or nagged) into being ready next time.

Different forms of Consensus

  • Consensus Minus One (you must have at least 2 to block)
  • Try for Consensus, settle for 2/3 or 3/4
  • Notas:
    • These alternative forms of consensus can be used all the time, used for only specific, defined decisions, or as a consistent fallback plan.
    • These alternatives are often used for groups of 20 and larger (on tougher decisions, consensus can be hard for this many to reach). Working hard on including everyone can be difficult but rewarding.

Practice Consensus Decision

10 minutes

Open for final questions/discussion

10 minutes