Difference between revisions of "Town Hall Meeting 2011"

From FreekiWiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search
m (→‎Reports: link for posting board report)
m
Line 13: Line 13:
 
==Volunteer Representatives==
 
==Volunteer Representatives==
  
As this was the inaugural town hall meeting, both (newly-created) volunteer representative board seats were to be filled.  The candidates were:
+
As this was the inaugural town hall meeting, both (newly-created) [[volunteer representative]] board seats were to be filled.  The candidates were formally introduced at this meeting and voting began.
  
 
* Jason Owen
 
* Jason Owen
Line 24: Line 24:
 
==Discussion==
 
==Discussion==
  
There was much discussed.
+
One of the major elements of the meeting was a collection of round-table discussions based around topics that were generated by the group at the meeting. Attendees were given post-its and posted potential topics, which were then clustered into five rough topics. Each topic had a table and facilitator. Their notes:
 +
 
  
 
==Lessons Learned==
 
==Lessons Learned==
Line 37: Line 38:
 
* post bios further in advance.
 
* post bios further in advance.
 
* explain the voting system better.
 
* explain the voting system better.
 +
* have plans (including whose responsibility it is) ahead of time for tallying votes, notifying candidates, and posting results
  
 
Some of the things that went swimmingly:
 
Some of the things that went swimmingly:
Line 47: Line 49:
 
Next time, perhaps we should change...
 
Next time, perhaps we should change...
  
 +
* get a setup crew and a cleanup crew of volunteers (maybe earning hours?)
 
* a more clearly defined division of labor - one person should not have had to do all the reporting.
 
* a more clearly defined division of labor - one person should not have had to do all the reporting.
 
* document the results more quickly after the meeting.
 
* document the results more quickly after the meeting.
 
* rotate discussion groups - people seemed to enjoy the small group discussions, but wanted to be in more than one group.
 
* rotate discussion groups - people seemed to enjoy the small group discussions, but wanted to be in more than one group.
 +
* clarify the means (governance) vs. ends (operations) division of focus between board and staff; make sure that people know that operations elements are not in the purview of the board, we are looking for larger-picture discussion. have this guide the selection of topics for roundtables (or decide topics beforehand)
 +
* post reports much farther beforehand
 +
* know what reports there are to be
  
 
But we should definitely still do...
 
But we should definitely still do...
Line 55: Line 61:
 
* the discussion-seeding brainstorming was pretty cool.
 
* the discussion-seeding brainstorming was pretty cool.
 
* the discussion format worked really well.
 
* the discussion format worked really well.
 +
* a cadre of assistant facilitators helps train our people as well as create more support for the meeting
 +
* having an outside facilitator was great

Revision as of 17:29, 2 November 2011

This is a stub. Please feel free to give this article love and attention if you know more about this topic than we have here.


The first Free Geek Town Hall Meeting was held on Sunday, October 2nd, at the Eagles Lodge.

http://lists.freegeek.org/pipermail/regulars/2011-September/000359.html

Reports

Our lovely outreach coordinator, Jessa, created and presented several reports on the state of Free Geek.

There was also a report from the board of directors about the challenges and successes of the organization in the last year.

Volunteer Representatives

As this was the inaugural town hall meeting, both (newly-created) volunteer representative board seats were to be filled. The candidates were formally introduced at this meeting and voting began.

  • Jason Owen
  • Eric Hamilton
  • Joe Bourguignon
  • Larry Lloyd

http://www.freegeek.org/free-geek-elections

Discussion

One of the major elements of the meeting was a collection of round-table discussions based around topics that were generated by the group at the meeting. Attendees were given post-its and posted potential topics, which were then clustered into five rough topics. Each topic had a table and facilitator. Their notes:


Lessons Learned

We knew going into this that there would be many mistakes made as we figured out how to organize and run such an event. There are two things that happened around the same time but are very distinct: the volunteer representative election and the town hall meeting itself.

Election

Some of the things we should have done differently include:

  • get @freegeek.org email addresses to candidates before bios are posted, and include them in the candidate descriptions.
  • post bios further in advance.
  • explain the voting system better.
  • have plans (including whose responsibility it is) ahead of time for tallying votes, notifying candidates, and posting results

Some of the things that went swimmingly:

  • Meet and greet at the THM.
  • ballot distribution - crossing people off a list when they received a ballot was simple and worked well.

Meeting

Next time, perhaps we should change...

  • get a setup crew and a cleanup crew of volunteers (maybe earning hours?)
  • a more clearly defined division of labor - one person should not have had to do all the reporting.
  • document the results more quickly after the meeting.
  • rotate discussion groups - people seemed to enjoy the small group discussions, but wanted to be in more than one group.
  • clarify the means (governance) vs. ends (operations) division of focus between board and staff; make sure that people know that operations elements are not in the purview of the board, we are looking for larger-picture discussion. have this guide the selection of topics for roundtables (or decide topics beforehand)
  • post reports much farther beforehand
  • know what reports there are to be

But we should definitely still do...

  • the discussion-seeding brainstorming was pretty cool.
  • the discussion format worked really well.
  • a cadre of assistant facilitators helps train our people as well as create more support for the meeting
  • having an outside facilitator was great