Difference between revisions of "User talk:Inhuman"
Halfasspete (talk | contribs) (Konqueror is a better bet than Firefox.) |
Halfasspete (talk | contribs) |
||
| Line 25: | Line 25: | ||
== Konqueror is a better bet than Firefox. == | == Konqueror is a better bet than Firefox. == | ||
| + | |||
| + | Say smb://servername/sharename | ||
| + | |||
| + | I don't think it will work without the name of the share. | ||
| + | |||
| + | --[[User:Halfasspete|Pete]] 21:33, 22 Dec 2005 (PST) | ||
Revision as of 22:33, 22 December 2005
Hi, my name is Michael McCall. I'm currently a builder, and an adoption teacher. I'll be spending time around Free Geek full-time during the time I'm in town for the summer if you need to find me. Days when I'll not be around will be posted soon.
I'm still trying to get my samba server to work. Anybody know what port I need to point my browser?
--Inhuman 09:40, 22 May 2005 (PDT)
Samba (SMB)
Samba doesn't use http, so you should be able to access it without knowing the port, either by going to
\\servername\
or smb://servername/
(depending on platform, and various such)
What program would I use to do that? I tried Mozilla Firefox on smb://localhost/, but it came up with nothing. Should I try Konqueror?
--Inhuman 18:15, 23 May 2005 (PDT)
Konqueror is a better bet than Firefox.
Say smb://servername/sharename
I don't think it will work without the name of the share.
--Pete 21:33, 22 Dec 2005 (PST)