Difference between revisions of "Talk:System Evaluation Overview"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
(responded) |
(Put back stuff?) |
||
| Line 2: | Line 2: | ||
If they don't have a hold for store label at that point, we don't want the case. I think you are right though that we don't want to label it until we get to the final reason, no motherboard. I changed it. Is that better? [[User:gambitnut|Blaine]] | If they don't have a hold for store label at that point, we don't want the case. I think you are right though that we don't want to label it until we get to the final reason, no motherboard. I changed it. Is that better? [[User:gambitnut|Blaine]] | ||
| + | |||
| + | == Put back stuff? == | ||
| + | |||
| + | For Servers [[Getting the Processor Information]] has them skip pulling stuff out (i.e. neither a SIMPLIFY nor a SWAP RAM step), so they will not have pulled stuff out yet. [[User:Rfs|RfS]] 16:38, 3 Feb 2006 (PST) | ||
Revision as of 17:38, 3 February 2006
This chart has us label with a reason for recycle label and mark the speed even if it's a special miner (in which case we pull the mobo and the label makes no sense no more). RfS
If they don't have a hold for store label at that point, we don't want the case. I think you are right though that we don't want to label it until we get to the final reason, no motherboard. I changed it. Is that better? Blaine
Put back stuff?
For Servers Getting the Processor Information has them skip pulling stuff out (i.e. neither a SIMPLIFY nor a SWAP RAM step), so they will not have pulled stuff out yet. RfS 16:38, 3 Feb 2006 (PST)