Difference between revisions of "Talk:Free Geek Principles"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
(Need for splitting up this page.) |
|||
| Line 7: | Line 7: | ||
[[User:Matteo|Matteo]] 12:42, 17 October 2006 (PDT) | [[User:Matteo|Matteo]] 12:42, 17 October 2006 (PDT) | ||
:Well after reading the Principles over and over, the wording makes sence how it is. [[User:Matteo|Matteo]] 07:51, 18 October 2006 (PDT) | :Well after reading the Principles over and over, the wording makes sence how it is. [[User:Matteo|Matteo]] 07:51, 18 October 2006 (PDT) | ||
| + | |||
| + | |||
| + | The bit at the end about our method of governance needs to be updated when the changes to Council and Board take effect in the Summer/Fall of 2011 [[User:Liliana|Liliana]] | ||
Latest revision as of 11:08, 29 July 2011
Reword Request
There needs to be a clear distinction made between principles that are officially adopted and those that are just talk, such as the entire section about "annotated" principles, which have never been approved. I suggest an unlocked page to contain the annotated principles, linked to from the actual principles approved by council. Can't do it myself, since I'm not an admin. Tonyc
- Recycling within the US: we prefer to.......
- The current wording is reflecting the US only. I'm not sure if only changing it to domestic would be correct. I bring up this up because having a Free Geek in Canada is not inprobable.
Matteo 12:42, 17 October 2006 (PDT)
- Well after reading the Principles over and over, the wording makes sence how it is. Matteo 07:51, 18 October 2006 (PDT)
The bit at the end about our method of governance needs to be updated when the changes to Council and Board take effect in the Summer/Fall of 2011 Liliana