Difference between revisions of "Talk:Optical Drive Testing"
(New page: 1) The sections of testing explanations should have a unique identifier which would correspond to identifiers '''within''' the major sections in the flowchart. That way the reader could go...) |
|||
| Line 15: | Line 15: | ||
Tex | Tex | ||
| + | |||
| + | Tex will be looking at the new page [[Optical Drive Testing 10.04]] We will need to delete this page after we finalize the new version. [[User:Elizabeth|Elizabeth]] 17:36, 20 October 2010 (UTC) | ||
Revision as of 10:36, 20 October 2010
1) The sections of testing explanations should have a unique identifier which would correspond to identifiers within the major sections in the flowchart. That way the reader could go directly to the verbose section from the flowchart to get more information about that topic.
2)In section 3 "Testing CD-RW writing" - it states 1. Insert a CD-RW into the drive. I'd like it to read 1. Insert a CD-RW disc into the drive... so there is no confusion.
3)Make sure #2 above is done for all references to DVD and CD discs where applicable throughout the document.
4)Section 3 item 6 - What is CF ? It is not explained anywhere in the document.
5)Section 4 #1 - the word "notated" is misused. A better word here would be "labeled".
6)I would like to see this document in table format, kinda like that work of art called "Motherboard Testing Manual". We should have a consistant format throughout all our manuals.
7)The flowchart is somewhat confusing. Direction lines should never cross other direction lines. A better top-down approach is warranted and the use of jump labels is encouraged. One entrance to the chart and one exit. That's standard practice.
Tex
Tex will be looking at the new page Optical Drive Testing 10.04 We will need to delete this page after we finalize the new version. Elizabeth 17:36, 20 October 2010 (UTC)