Difference between revisions of "Talk:Wifi Use Statement"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
| Line 4: | Line 4: | ||
Is this a little outdated? Most of the early fears about use of the 2.4ghz spectrum have been debunked. After all, even things like the microwave ovens and such use that spectrum, and at much higher power densities. | Is this a little outdated? Most of the early fears about use of the 2.4ghz spectrum have been debunked. After all, even things like the microwave ovens and such use that spectrum, and at much higher power densities. | ||
-[[User:Wy|Wy]] 21:09, 14 August 2007 (PDT) | -[[User:Wy|Wy]] 21:09, 14 August 2007 (PDT) | ||
| + | :Anything 3 years old is likely to be outdated and can use some reworking. It is probably time to revisit the issue. I have not really studied it, but there still seem to be political, social and environmental issues with tantalum mining. - [[User:MichaelWestwind|MW]] 09:27, 15 August 2007 (PDT) | ||
Latest revision as of 08:27, 15 August 2007
Ok, this is my first draft: the bolded sections were added to make it a bit easier to skim, since it's so long. However, i think it's still too long and needs to be condensed a bit. --Ideath 14:02, 13 Nov 2004 (PST)
Is this a little outdated? Most of the early fears about use of the 2.4ghz spectrum have been debunked. After all, even things like the microwave ovens and such use that spectrum, and at much higher power densities. -Wy 21:09, 14 August 2007 (PDT)
- Anything 3 years old is likely to be outdated and can use some reworking. It is probably time to revisit the issue. I have not really studied it, but there still seem to be political, social and environmental issues with tantalum mining. - MW 09:27, 15 August 2007 (PDT)