Difference between revisions of "General Administration Plan"

From FreekiWiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Line 8: Line 8:
 
* Meetings
 
* Meetings
 
The overall question is ''"How will Free Geek survive and fulfill its mission and live up to its principles over the next five years?"'', but here we are talking about administrative tasks. In other words, we are asking how Free Geek's structures and such will support the principles and mission.
 
The overall question is ''"How will Free Geek survive and fulfill its mission and live up to its principles over the next five years?"'', but here we are talking about administrative tasks. In other words, we are asking how Free Geek's structures and such will support the principles and mission.
 +
 +
=== Meetings and committee structure ===
 +
As Free Geek has grown, its staff has delegated a number of decision making tasks to standing committees. The same can be said of the community council. The recent establishment of the [[Optimization and Priorities]] group and the [[Space Cadets]] are examples of this.
 +
 +
If Free Geek continues to grow, there could be a restructuring of the staff into three or four sub-collectives that have more autonomy regarding their hiring and schedules. It is likely that the board would establish a few standing committees as well, for example a formal budgeting committee. If this pattern of decentralization continues, there will need to be more emphasis on communication between the various groups. For instance assuming a larger number of collecitve members, it will be impossible to require them all to attend at a weekly meeting. This would mean more substantive decisions would get made at the committee (or sub-collective) level. In turn, this would require the coordinating group (currently C7) to transform into a more representative body. We would have to get better at posting concise reports to our email lists and also develop better habits of reading those reports.
  
 
== SWOT ==
 
== SWOT ==

Revision as of 08:54, 3 August 2007

This is a draft of a new or in-progress document, and is likely to have a few people specifically working on it. You may wish to check in on the discussion page to see what the purpose of the document is and who's working on it; then feel free to give this article love and attention if have extra of those things.


Intro

This page should address the following areas, looking ahead 3-5 years.

  • HR
  • Funding
  • Budgeting
  • Bookkeeping
  • Meetings

The overall question is "How will Free Geek survive and fulfill its mission and live up to its principles over the next five years?", but here we are talking about administrative tasks. In other words, we are asking how Free Geek's structures and such will support the principles and mission.

Meetings and committee structure

As Free Geek has grown, its staff has delegated a number of decision making tasks to standing committees. The same can be said of the community council. The recent establishment of the Optimization and Priorities group and the Space Cadets are examples of this.

If Free Geek continues to grow, there could be a restructuring of the staff into three or four sub-collectives that have more autonomy regarding their hiring and schedules. It is likely that the board would establish a few standing committees as well, for example a formal budgeting committee. If this pattern of decentralization continues, there will need to be more emphasis on communication between the various groups. For instance assuming a larger number of collecitve members, it will be impossible to require them all to attend at a weekly meeting. This would mean more substantive decisions would get made at the committee (or sub-collective) level. In turn, this would require the coordinating group (currently C7) to transform into a more representative body. We would have to get better at posting concise reports to our email lists and also develop better habits of reading those reports.

SWOT

Please define a goal for this SWOT
Good (for Free Geek) Bad (for Free Geek)
Internal
(to Free Geek)

Strengths: Strengths are advantages we have that are internal to Free Geek and helpful to achieving the objective. (Good things we do.)

  • first
  • second

Weaknesses: Weaknesses are problems we have that are internal to Free Geek and harmful to achieving the objective. (Things we do poorly or not at all.)

  • first
  • second
External
(to Free Geek)

Opportunities: Opportunities are advantages we have that are external to Free Geek and helpful to achieving the objective. (Good things that will or could happen to us.)

  • first
  • second

Threats: Threats are problems we have that are external to Free Geek and harmful to achieving the objective. (Bad things that will or could happen to us.)

  • first
  • second

See also Trends and Attributes | What do we want to do?



Related Documents