Difference between revisions of "Talk:Specific Options for Reducing Staffing Costs"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
(a thought) |
m |
||
| (One intermediate revision by the same user not shown) | |||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
Regarding the fact that the "possible recommendations" do not give us enough of a savings in the short term, would it help to have a 10% pay cut for just March and April and then push it back to 5% (or less) in May when the other measures would kick in? [[User:MichaelWestwind|MW]] 19:40, 2 Mar 2005 (PST) | Regarding the fact that the "possible recommendations" do not give us enough of a savings in the short term, would it help to have a 10% pay cut for just March and April and then push it back to 5% (or less) in May when the other measures would kick in? [[User:MichaelWestwind|MW]] 19:40, 2 Mar 2005 (PST) | ||
| + | |||
| + | It would help, but I don't think I can afford it. Between the 5% pay cut, having to come up with $279 before April 15 for taxes, and having more taxes withheld so this isn't repeated next year, I'm stretched pretty tight already. [[User:Rfs|rfs]] 08:33, 3 Mar 2005 (PST) | ||
Latest revision as of 09:33, 3 March 2005
Regarding the fact that the "possible recommendations" do not give us enough of a savings in the short term, would it help to have a 10% pay cut for just March and April and then push it back to 5% (or less) in May when the other measures would kick in? MW 19:40, 2 Mar 2005 (PST)
It would help, but I don't think I can afford it. Between the 5% pay cut, having to come up with $279 before April 15 for taxes, and having more taxes withheld so this isn't repeated next year, I'm stretched pretty tight already. rfs 08:33, 3 Mar 2005 (PST)