Difference between revisions of "PR Vision Sandbox"

From FreekiWiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Line 14: Line 14:
 
  | strengths =
 
  | strengths =
  
*Add things like so
+
*Many great stories available regarding grant recipients
  
 
  | weaknesses =
 
  | weaknesses =
 +
*Data Security
  
 
  | opportunities =
 
  | opportunities =
 +
 +
*Great cred. in the community
 +
*Ongoing discussions with potential community partners
 +
*Many groups contacting us about potential events
 +
*Existing City partnership has excellent potential for PR
  
 
  | threats =  
 
  | threats =  
 +
*We're scrappy, which is great. May be off-putting to corporate-types
  
 
}}
 
}}

Revision as of 15:44, 19 April 2009

The PR committee's regular meeting on May 9, 2009 has been set aside to be a long-term strategic planning session.

This page is a place to hold discussion to this end.

OK! Go!

Check out the PR Plan page to see where this discussion was left last.

Here's a blank SWOT we can populate:

SWOT

Please define a goal for this SWOT
Good (for Free Geek) Bad (for Free Geek)
Internal
(to Free Geek)

Strengths: Strengths are advantages we have that are internal to Free Geek and helpful to achieving the objective. (Good things we do.)

  • Many great stories available regarding grant recipients

Weaknesses: Weaknesses are problems we have that are internal to Free Geek and harmful to achieving the objective. (Things we do poorly or not at all.)

  • Data Security
External
(to Free Geek)

Opportunities: Opportunities are advantages we have that are external to Free Geek and helpful to achieving the objective. (Good things that will or could happen to us.)

  • Great cred. in the community
  • Ongoing discussions with potential community partners
  • Many groups contacting us about potential events
  • Existing City partnership has excellent potential for PR

Threats: Threats are problems we have that are external to Free Geek and harmful to achieving the objective. (Bad things that will or could happen to us.)

  • We're scrappy, which is great. May be off-putting to corporate-types

See also Trends and Attributes | What do we want to do?