Difference between revisions of "FreekiWiki talk:Template messages"

From FreekiWiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Line 10: Line 10:
 
*Stub
 
*Stub
 
**Stub Stub Stub
 
**Stub Stub Stub
 +
 +
Matt, check out the template called Cleanup. At the least, it oughtta be added to your list...but also, it might be kinda redundant of others. --[[User:Halfasspete|Pete]] 14:18, 4 Jan 2006 (PST)
  
 
== formatting ==
 
== formatting ==
Line 23: Line 25:
 
--[[User:matteo|matteo]]
 
--[[User:matteo|matteo]]
 
::I agree.  The clearer the better. [[User:MichaelWestwind|MW]] 17:41, 27 Dec 2005 (PST)
 
::I agree.  The clearer the better. [[User:MichaelWestwind|MW]] 17:41, 27 Dec 2005 (PST)
 +
:fine by me. I think this looks great. --[[User:Halfasspete|Pete]] 14:18, 4 Jan 2006 (PST)

Revision as of 14:18, 4 January 2006

Wish List

Place Names or descriptions of Template messages youd like to see implemented

  • Template
    • This page goes in to many directions
    • Disputed content see talk page
  • InfoBox
    • Grant info
    • Program info
    • Place info
  • Stub
    • Stub Stub Stub

Matt, check out the template called Cleanup. At the least, it oughtta be added to your list...but also, it might be kinda redundant of others. --Pete 14:18, 4 Jan 2006 (PST)

formatting

Matteo, I think this page is a great idea. I think it might be more useful if the formatting was simpler, so it could be updated more easily. For instance, I don't think the reader needs to actually see curly braces on every entry...as long as they understand in general they need to use curly braces. That alone would remove a lot of wiki/nowiki tages, making it easier to make edits, add new template links and descriptions, etc.

--Pete 16:21, 27 Dec 2005 (PST)

Pete, I am using standerd wikipedia formating. I beleave the more description the better. This page is not ment to be edited often.

Wikipedia:Template namespace
Wikipedia:Template messages
Wikipedia:Template messages/Cleanup

--matteo

I agree. The clearer the better. MW 17:41, 27 Dec 2005 (PST)
fine by me. I think this looks great. --Pete 14:18, 4 Jan 2006 (PST)