Difference between revisions of "FreekiWiki talk:Template messages"
Halfasspete (talk | contribs) |
|||
Line 10: | Line 10: | ||
*Stub | *Stub | ||
**Stub Stub Stub | **Stub Stub Stub | ||
+ | |||
+ | Matt, check out the template called Cleanup. At the least, it oughtta be added to your list...but also, it might be kinda redundant of others. --[[User:Halfasspete|Pete]] 14:18, 4 Jan 2006 (PST) | ||
== formatting == | == formatting == | ||
Line 23: | Line 25: | ||
--[[User:matteo|matteo]] | --[[User:matteo|matteo]] | ||
::I agree. The clearer the better. [[User:MichaelWestwind|MW]] 17:41, 27 Dec 2005 (PST) | ::I agree. The clearer the better. [[User:MichaelWestwind|MW]] 17:41, 27 Dec 2005 (PST) | ||
+ | :fine by me. I think this looks great. --[[User:Halfasspete|Pete]] 14:18, 4 Jan 2006 (PST) |
Revision as of 14:18, 4 January 2006
Wish List
Place Names or descriptions of Template messages youd like to see implemented
- Template
- This page goes in to many directions
- Disputed content see talk page
- InfoBox
- Grant info
- Program info
- Place info
- Stub
- Stub Stub Stub
Matt, check out the template called Cleanup. At the least, it oughtta be added to your list...but also, it might be kinda redundant of others. --Pete 14:18, 4 Jan 2006 (PST)
formatting
Matteo, I think this page is a great idea. I think it might be more useful if the formatting was simpler, so it could be updated more easily. For instance, I don't think the reader needs to actually see curly braces on every entry...as long as they understand in general they need to use curly braces. That alone would remove a lot of wiki/nowiki tages, making it easier to make edits, add new template links and descriptions, etc.
--Pete 16:21, 27 Dec 2005 (PST)
Pete, I am using standerd wikipedia formating. I beleave the more description the better. This page is not ment to be edited often.
--matteo