Difference between revisions of "Layoffs and Hours Reduction"

From FreekiWiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search
 
 
(66 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
- Layoff/hrs reduction policy
+
'''This page left for historical purposes.''' -- [[User:Mkille|Mkille]] ([[User talk:Mkille|talk]]) 16:49, 13 August 2013 (PDT)
Discussion:
 
Possible ways to reduce hours: seniority, merit, voluntary, eliminate
 
overlapping job functionality hours (where there's cocoordinators)
 
For merit-based, we must have some fair, hard and fast criteria; in long run,
 
best for organization as a whole, but can cause lots of interpersonal harm
 
Seniority: easy to determine
 
HR could make report to staff that kind of pre-digests the issues involved
 
Wage reduction should be considered first, and if untenable, then move on to
 
other options
 
If we sense there'll be a problem, we could nominate or call for an ad hoc
 
committee to present the options.  Staff would decide.
 
  
PROPOSAL:
+
 
In the event of a looming financial problem that would require a cut in staff  
+
{{Policy Header
costs, the HR committee would nominate an ad hoc committee.  Staff would  
+
| PolicyName = Layoffs and Hours Reduction }}
dicuss and approve the appointments of the individuals on the committee.  The  
+
''(Approved by Staff Meeting February 18, 2005)''
ad hoc committee will digest the issues involved and make a report to staff  
+
 
suggesting a way to proceed.
+
 
Ways to determine where to make the cuts (in the order they should be  
+
==Scope==
utilized):
+
This policy addresses looming financial problems that might require a cut in staff costs. It is not intended to be used in lieu of a staff discipline policy. If a financial crisis is looming and there are staff discipline issues pending, there should be an attempt to deal with the discipline issues early on and apart from this policy.
1) Wage reduction; Voluntary hours cut
+
 
2) Merit-based. The organization is most important here. - make department
+
==Layoffs and Reduction Report Committee==
audit? Use review data? Person's program is costing money: this nominates
+
The HR committee would nominate an ad hoc '''Layoffs and Reductions Report Committee'''.  Staff would discuss the nominations and make a final decision on the makeup of the committee. In determining the makeup of the committee staff members should prioritize who would be appropriate to the committee, including people with a long-standing history with Free Geek and people with a working knowledge of the finances.  Also, the staff should consider the overall balance of the committee.  There may be other considerations as well.
them for cuts? Operational impact? Financial impact? What would happen if X
+
 
person didn't show up for work tomorrow?  What would happen if X program was
+
This committee should only be formed after alternatives to staff cuts have been considered including various ways to increase revenue and reduce other costs.
cancelled tomorrow? Possibility of shuffling people to other positions. Is
+
 
there some overlapping job functionality that could be eliminated?
+
The staff must provide to the committee a '''target amount of savings''' that needs to be achieved.
3) Seniority - after the other two methods above have been used. Possibly as
+
 
tie-breaker.
+
The committee will then consider the issues involved and make a '''Layoffs and Reductions Report''' to the staff collective suggesting options for consideration.
 +
 
 +
==Considerations==
 +
The ways to determine where to make the cuts should be considered in the following order. All items below must be considered before a recomendation is made.
 +
 
 +
;Review alternatives first
 +
:The committee must review what fundraising options and other cost cutting measures have been considered before recommending to reduce hours or lay off staff members.
 +
 
 +
;Consider a staffwide wage cut
 +
:The committee must calculate how much of a staffwide wage reduction would be needed to meet the target amount. This must be a percentage reduction that applies consistently to all staff members. The committee should determine if this will solve the problem without causing unreasonable hardship for anyone.
 +
 
 +
;Consider a voluntary hours cuts
 +
:The committee must consult with each staff member to determine if anyone is willing to temporarily or permanently voluntarily reduce the number of hours they work and if so, by how much. The committee must also ask if anyone is willing to take a voluntary unpaid leave of absence.
 +
 
 +
:Staff members offering that their hours be cut should actually plan to work less hours. They should not volunteer to work "for free" since this can lead to an imbalance in staff expectations.
 +
 
 +
;Job performance based cuts
 +
:The committee must consider data from existing staff reviews. For each staff member (including those without existing staff reviews on file), the committee must consider the impact on the organization if that staff member were to leave the staff. This should be based on the staff member's overall job performance.
 +
 
 +
;Program and job function based cuts
 +
:The committee must consider what jobs and programs could be eliminated or scaled back, and what effect that would likely have on the organization as a whole.
 +
 
 +
:The committee must consider overlapping job functionality.  
 +
 
 +
:The committee must consider how each job and program addresses the mission of the organization and how much money it brings in and costs.
 +
 
 +
;Seniority
 +
:After the above criteria have been considered, seniority may be considered as a method of determining hours cuts or layoffs.
 +
 
 +
==Report of Options and Recommendations==
 +
The report must provide options for consideration to the full staff collective. Options that were discussed but rejected must also be reported on, along with the reason for rejection.
 +
 
 +
The committee may recommend options. If included, these recommendations must be based on the considerations listed above.
 +
 
 +
For each option listed, the report must consider the impact on Free Geek's mission and the operational and financial impacts to the organization.
 +
 
 +
The report should also consider the possibility of shuffling people to other positions to minimize negative impact on Free Geek.
 +
 
 +
The report should consider if temporary layoffs or hours cuts might solve the problem, and if so, the report should state the expected length of time that the cuts would be in effect.
 +
 
 +
==Staff action on the report==
 +
The staff must then review the report and decide on a course of action.
 +
 
 +
If the staff decides to layoff or cut hours at least two week's notice should be given to the staff members affected.
 +
 
 +
[[Category:Policy]]
 +
 
 +
== Related Documents ==
 +
''(Not part of the policy, but useful during implementation.)''
 +
* [[Reduction Committee Tasks]]
 +
* [[Fundraising and Other Cost Cutting Measures]]
 +
* [[Layoffs and Hours Reduction Survey]]
 +
* [[General Options for Reducing Staffing Costs]]
 +
* [[Results from the Layoffs and Hours Reduction Survey]]
 +
* [[Specific Options for Reducing Staffing Costs]]

Latest revision as of 15:49, 13 August 2013

This page left for historical purposes. -- Mkille (talk) 16:49, 13 August 2013 (PDT)


Layoffs and Hours Reduction: '
List of Policies - Policy Development


(Approved by Staff Meeting February 18, 2005)


Scope

This policy addresses looming financial problems that might require a cut in staff costs. It is not intended to be used in lieu of a staff discipline policy. If a financial crisis is looming and there are staff discipline issues pending, there should be an attempt to deal with the discipline issues early on and apart from this policy.

Layoffs and Reduction Report Committee

The HR committee would nominate an ad hoc Layoffs and Reductions Report Committee. Staff would discuss the nominations and make a final decision on the makeup of the committee. In determining the makeup of the committee staff members should prioritize who would be appropriate to the committee, including people with a long-standing history with Free Geek and people with a working knowledge of the finances. Also, the staff should consider the overall balance of the committee. There may be other considerations as well.

This committee should only be formed after alternatives to staff cuts have been considered including various ways to increase revenue and reduce other costs.

The staff must provide to the committee a target amount of savings that needs to be achieved.

The committee will then consider the issues involved and make a Layoffs and Reductions Report to the staff collective suggesting options for consideration.

Considerations

The ways to determine where to make the cuts should be considered in the following order. All items below must be considered before a recomendation is made.

Review alternatives first
The committee must review what fundraising options and other cost cutting measures have been considered before recommending to reduce hours or lay off staff members.
Consider a staffwide wage cut
The committee must calculate how much of a staffwide wage reduction would be needed to meet the target amount. This must be a percentage reduction that applies consistently to all staff members. The committee should determine if this will solve the problem without causing unreasonable hardship for anyone.
Consider a voluntary hours cuts
The committee must consult with each staff member to determine if anyone is willing to temporarily or permanently voluntarily reduce the number of hours they work and if so, by how much. The committee must also ask if anyone is willing to take a voluntary unpaid leave of absence.
Staff members offering that their hours be cut should actually plan to work less hours. They should not volunteer to work "for free" since this can lead to an imbalance in staff expectations.
Job performance based cuts
The committee must consider data from existing staff reviews. For each staff member (including those without existing staff reviews on file), the committee must consider the impact on the organization if that staff member were to leave the staff. This should be based on the staff member's overall job performance.
Program and job function based cuts
The committee must consider what jobs and programs could be eliminated or scaled back, and what effect that would likely have on the organization as a whole.
The committee must consider overlapping job functionality.
The committee must consider how each job and program addresses the mission of the organization and how much money it brings in and costs.
Seniority
After the above criteria have been considered, seniority may be considered as a method of determining hours cuts or layoffs.

Report of Options and Recommendations

The report must provide options for consideration to the full staff collective. Options that were discussed but rejected must also be reported on, along with the reason for rejection.

The committee may recommend options. If included, these recommendations must be based on the considerations listed above.

For each option listed, the report must consider the impact on Free Geek's mission and the operational and financial impacts to the organization.

The report should also consider the possibility of shuffling people to other positions to minimize negative impact on Free Geek.

The report should consider if temporary layoffs or hours cuts might solve the problem, and if so, the report should state the expected length of time that the cuts would be in effect.

Staff action on the report

The staff must then review the report and decide on a course of action.

If the staff decides to layoff or cut hours at least two week's notice should be given to the staff members affected.

Related Documents

(Not part of the policy, but useful during implementation.)